Regime change as official policy; 64 Canadian MPs supported U.S.-led invasion of Iraq
Regime change in
“We aim to change this. We aim to make the case and rally support for American global leadership.”
“Does the
“We seem to have forgotten the essential elements of the Reagan Administration's success: a military that is strong and ready to meet both present and future challenges; a foreign policy that boldly and purposefully promotes American principles abroad; and national leadership that accepts the
“
“… we need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global responsibilities… we need to strengthen our ties to democratic allies and to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values… we need to promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad… we need to accept responsibility for America's unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.”
“Such a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity may not be fashionable today. But it is necessary if the
– Statement of Principles, June 3, 1997, The Project for the New American Century (PNAC). [Members of PNAC have included: Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz,
“We are writing you because we are convinced that current American policy toward
“The only acceptable strategy is one that eliminates the possibility that
“We urge you to articulate this aim, and to turn your Administration's attention to implementing a strategy for removing Saddam's regime from power.”
– Letter to President Bill Clinton from The Project for the New American Century, January 26, 1998 [Signatories include Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and Richard Armitage]
“It should be the policy of the
– Sec. 3 of the ‘
“Today, the
“In the
“After eight years of no-fly-zone operations, there is little reason to anticipate that the
“To preserve American military preeminence in the coming decades, the Department of Defense must move more aggressively to experiment with new technologies and operational concepts, and seek to exploit the emerging revolution in military affairs.”
“Any serious effort at transformation must occur within the larger framework of
“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new
– Rebuilding
Q: Two years ago, you signed an open letter with a number of other officials who were --
Rumsfeld: Well, I've signed a number of letters. It's amazing, I never had any idea I'd be back here when I did that.
Q: Well, you did.
Q: This particular open letter had to do with the Iraqi opposition. And among the things –
Rumsfeld: I still feel good about that one.
Q: Well, let's just run through some of the things that you were advocating for the past administration. Among the things that you were advocating was that the administration bomb the pillars of support of Saddam Hussein in an (inaudible) campaign, and that the
Rumsfeld: Well, you know, we're going to be having meetings on that subject in the period ahead. And I've had some preliminary discussions with members of the national security team. And I think that it would not be wise for me to get into the details of it. It is going to be an administration policy, a presidential policy. Secretary Powell will be deeply involved. And certainly the Department of Defense is involved, given the degree of -- level of activity there. But I don't think it would be useful for me to --
Q: You seemed to have strong feelings on that subject at that time, and you still do, I gather.
Rumsfeld: Well, I think that the policy of the country is that it is not helpful to have Saddam Hussein's regime in office. That is government policy, as I understand it.
– Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, Press Briefing, January 26, 2001
“I think the Congress has passed legislation that suggests that a regime change in
– Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, Interview on Fox News Sunday, February 11, 2001
“At my request, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld has begun a comprehensive review of the
“That report will mark the beginning of a new defense agenda, and a new strategic vision, and will be the basis for allocating our defense resources.”
– President George W. Bush, Remarks to the Troops and Personnel,
“[The 2002] budget I submitted to Congress makes national defense a priority. I've asked Congress to provide the largest increase in military spending since Ronald Reagan was the President and Commander-in-Chief of the
– President George W. Bush, at American Legion, San Antonio Convention Center, San Antonio, Texas, August 29, 2001
“We agree with Secretary of State Powell’s recent statement that Saddam Hussein “is one of the leading terrorists on the face of the Earth….” It may be that the Iraqi government provided assistance in some form to the recent attack on the
– Letter to President George W. Bush from The Project for the New American Century, September 20, 2001
‘
“In setting requirements for nuclear strike capabilities, distinctions can be made among the contingencies for which the
“
– Nuclear Posture Review
“
“
– President George W. Bush, State of the Union Address, The
“Maybe I should be a little less direct and be a little more nuanced, and say we support regime change.”
– President George W. Bush, April 6, 2002, Joint Press Conference with Prime Minister Blair, Crawford High School, Crawford, Texas
“The stated policy of my government is that we have a regime change. And as I told President Chirac, I have no war plans on my desk. And I will continue to consult closely with him. We do view Saddam Hussein as a serious, significant -- serious threat to stability and peace.”
– President George W. Bush, May 26, 2002, Meeting with French President Chirac
“It's the stated policy of this government to have a regime change. And it hasn't changed. And we'll use all tools at our disposal to do so.”
“I'm involved. I mean, I'm involved in the military planning, diplomatic planning, financial planning, all aspects of -- reviewing all the tools at my disposal. And -- but in my remarks to American people, I remind them I'm a patient person and there's a -- but I do firmly believe that the world will be safer and more peaceful if there's a regime change in that government.”
– President George W. Bush, July 8, 2002, Press Conference, James S. Brady Briefing Room
“When the Prime Minister discussed Iraq with President Bush at Crawford in April he said that the UK would support military action to bring about regime change, provided that certain conditions were met: efforts had been made to construct a coalition/shape public opinion, the Israel-Palestine Crisis was quiescent, and the options for action to eliminate Iraq's WMD through the UN weapons inspectors had been exhausted.”
“[A political framework] is particularly important for the
“US military planning unambiguously takes as its objective the removal of Saddam Hussein's regime, followed by elimination if Iraqi WMD.”
“
“The
–
“Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy.”
“It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbours, and his WMD capability was less than that of
“The Attorney-General [Lord Goldsmith] said that the desire for regime change was not a legal base for military action.”
“The Prime Minister said that it would make a big difference politically and legally if Saddam refused to allow in the UN inspectors. Regime change and WMD were linked in the sense that it was the regime that was producing the WMD.”
– Memo to David Manning, Foreign Policy Advisor from Matthew Rycroft (aide to Manning), Iraq: Prime Minister’s Meeting, July 23, 2002
“The policy of my government, our government, of this administration is regime change. For a reason. Saddam Hussein is a man who poisons his own people, who threatens his neighbors, who develops weapons of mass destruction.”
– President George W. Bush, August 1, 2002, Remarks by the President and His Majesty King Abdullah of the
“We will actively work to bring the hope of democracy, development, free markets, and free trade to every corner of the world.”
“While the
“The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is critical because of the toll of human suffering, because of
“The
“The purpose of our actions will always be to eliminate a specific threat to the
“Free markets and free trade are key priorities of our national security strategy.”
“[NATO] must be able to act wherever our interests are threatened, creating coalitions under NATO’s own mandate, as well as contributing to mission-based coalitions. To achieve this, we must: take advantage of the technological opportunities and economies of scale in our defense spending to transform NATO military forces so that they dominate potential aggressors and diminish our vulnerabilities.”
“It is time to reaffirm the essential role of American military strength. We must build and maintain our defenses beyond challenge. Our military’s highest priority is to defend the
“To contend with uncertainty and to meet the many security challenges we face, the
“Our forces will be strong enough to dissuade potential adversaries from pursuing a military build-up in hopes of surpassing, or equaling, the power of the
“We will take the actions necessary to ensure that our efforts to meet our global security commitments and protect Americans are not impaired by the potential for investigations, inquiry, or prosecution by the International Criminal Court (ICC), whose jurisdiction does not extend to Americans and which we do not accept.”
– The National Security Strategy of the
“Well, as you know, our government in 1998 -- action that my administration has embraced -- decided that this regime was not going to honor its commitments to get rid of weapons of mass destruction. The
– President George W. Bush, September 7, 2002, Remarks by the President and Prime Minister Tony Blair in Photo Opportunity,
Q: So is the goal to disarm Saddam Hussein or is it regime change?
– Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, Interview with Good Morning
“Mr. Speaker, I repeat once again that our position is that current United Nations resolutions provide sufficient international justification for action.”
– Stephen Harper, Leader of the Opposition, Canadian
“The
–
“The stated policy of the
– President George W. Bush, October 21, 2002, Remarks by the President and NATO Secretary General Lord Robertson in Photo Opportunity, The Oval Office
“Well, I hope we don't have to go to war, but if we go to war, we will disarm
– President George W. Bush, March 6, 2003, President Discusses
“…regime change cannot be the objective of military action. This should be borne in mind in considering the list of military targets and in making public statements about any campaign.”
“…the
“I remain of the opinion that the safest legal course would be to secure the adoption of a further [UN Security Council] resolution to authorize the use of force.”
–
“After three months of intrusive inspections, we have to date found no evidence or plausible indication of the revival of a nuclear weapon program in
– Mohamed ElBaradei, Director General, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), March 7, 2003, report to UN Security Council
“As I noted on 14 February, intelligence authorities have claimed that weapons of mass destruction are moved around
– Dr. Hans Blix, Executive Chairman, United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC), March 7, 2003, report to UN Security Council
“The
– President George W. Bush, March 17, 2003, Remarks by the President in Address to the Nation, The Cross Hall
“Mr. Speaker, in my speech, I did address the issue of the legality of this action. We firmly believe that this intervention is legal under international law.
We are disappointed—and our take on this is completely different from that of the Bloc Quebecois—that some of the permanent members of the Security Council, including France, have decided to back out of their commitments pursuant to resolution 1441 and previous resolutions. It is unfortunate, but it is now up to our allies, our historical allies, namely the Americans and the British, to act. We support their action.”
– Stephen Harper, Leader of the Opposition, Canadian
“Just under a week into this conflict, let me restate our complete and total resolve. Saddam Hussein and his hateful regime will be removed from power.
– British Prime Minister Tony Blair, March 27, 2003, President Bush, Prime Minister Blair Hold Press Availability, Camp David, Maryland
“God bless
– Stephen Harper, Leader of the Opposition, Canadian
“The House would know that on several occasions I have cited, including today, mais je l'ai fait en français, resolutions 678, 687 and 1441 of the United Nations as giving to this intervention, in my view, the legal authority of the United Nations. So I believe that this is a conflict under United Nations authority.”
– Joe Clark, Progressive Conservative Party MP, April 8, 2003, House of Commons
“Our party has been very clear on this since the beginning. Yes, Saddam Hussein must be disarmed, but this must be done through international institutions, by the UN inspection process, and it must be done peacefully. We said that this war was illegitimate, illegal and unjustified.”
“It is in no one's interest to implement a philosophy of pre-emptive war. This is only the beginning. From now on, everyone will be able to point to this totally ridiculous notion of attacking someone because one day they might attack us.”
– Gilles Duceppe, Bloc Québécois MP, April 8, 2003, House of Commons
For us to say that we support Bush in the accomplishment of his mission is just wrong-headed because his mission is regime change. His mission is to conduct a pre-emptive strike which is against all international law.
– Alexa McDonough, New Democratic Party MP, April 8, 2003, House of Commons
“We went to war on the basis of destroying weapons of mass destruction. The war is nearly over and we have not found any.
The reason war happened was the Security Council was set aside and a new objective came into being, that of regime change. If wars become legitimate to ensure regime change, where do we start and where do we end?”
– Clifford Lincoln, Liberal Party, April 8, 2003, House of Commons
“[The agenda] has suddenly changed from weapons of mass destruction, which, by the way, were not found, to becoming a regime change.”
– Libby Davies, New Democratic Party MP, April 8, 2003, House of Commons
“I am disappointed with the
“Under the leadership of President Bush, the
“The philosophy of the Bush doctrine was spawned by a group of neo-conservatives in
– Andrew Telegdi, Liberal Party MP, April 8, 2003, House of Commons
37th PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION
Journals
No. 86
Tuesday, April 8, 2003
Pursuant to Orders made Thursday, April 3 and April 7, 2003, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Harper (Calgary Southwest), seconded by Mr. Hill (Macleod), – That the House of Commons express its regret and apologize for offensive and inappropriate statements made against the United States of America by certain Members of this House; that it reaffirm the United States to be Canada’s closest friend and ally and hope that the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq is successful in removing Saddam Hussein’s regime from power; and that the House urge the Government of Canada to assist the coalition in the reconstruction of Iraq.
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 143)
YEAS: 64, NAYS: 165
The following 64 MPs – including the four representing
Jim Abbott (Kootenay—
Diane Ablonczy (
Rob Anders (
Anderson
Roy Bailey (Souris—
Leon Benoit (
Rick Borotsik (
Garry Breitkreuz (
Rick Casson (
David Chatters (Athabasca) Canadian
Joe Clark (
Stockwell Day (Okanagan—Coquihalla) Canadian
John Duncan (
Reed Elley (
Ken Epp (
Brian Fitzpatrick (
Paul Forseth (
Cheryl Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke) Canadian
Peter Goldring (
Jim Gouk (Kootenay—Boundary—Okanagan) Canadian
Gurmant Grewal (Surrey Central) Canadian
Deborah Grey (
Stephen Harper (
Richard Harris (
Loyola Hearn (
John Herron (Fundy—Royal) Progressive Conservative
Jay Hill (
Grant Hill (Macleod) Canadian
Howard Hilstrom (Selkirk—Interlake) Canadian
Betty Hinton (
Rahim Jaffer (
Dale Johnston (Wetaskiwin) Canadian
Gerald Keddy (
Jason Kenney (
Gary Lunn (Saanich—
James Lunney (
Peter MacKay (Pictou—Antigonish—Guysborough) Progressive Conservative
Keith Martin (
Philip Mayfield (Cariboo—Chilcotin) Canadian
Val Meredith (South Surrey—White Rock—
Rob Merrifield (Yellowhead) Canadian
Bob Mills (
James Moore (Port Moody—Coquitlam—
Deepak Obhrai (
Jim Pankiw (
Charlie Penson (Peace River) Canadian
James Rajotte (
Scott Reid (Lanark—Carleton) Canadian
John Reynolds (
Gerry Ritz (Battlefords—
Werner Schmidt (
Carol Skelton (
Monte Solberg (
Kevin Sorenson (Crowfoot) Canadian
Larry Spencer (
Darrel Stinson (Okanagan—Shuswap) Canadian
Chuck Strahl (
Greg Thompson (
Maurice Vellacott (
Pierrette Venne (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert) Independent Bloc Québécois
Elsie Wayne (
Ted White (
John Williams (
Lynne Yelich (Blackstrap) Canadian
“This is George W Bush, the President of the
– President George W. Bush, April 10, 2003, President's Message to the Iraqi People
Q: I wanted to ask you that - do you think that the resolution that was passed on
A: Well, I'm one of those who believe that there should have been a second resolution because the Security Council indicated that if
Q: So you don't think there was legal authority for the war?
A: I have stated clearly that it was not in conformity with the Security Council - with the UN Charter.
Q: It was illegal?
A: Yes, if you wish.
Q: It was illegal?
A: Yes, I have indicated it is not in conformity with the UN Charter, from our point of view and from the Charter point of view it was illegal.
– Kofi Annan, United Nations Secretary General, Interview with Owen Bennett-Jones for BBC World Service at UN headquarters in New York, September 16, 2004
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home