Wall government refusing to disclose ‘witch hunt’ report and Zorn-Mitchell emails; whistleblower protection law deeply flawed

Government Services briefing note

Eight months after firing a provincial corrections employee for not following proper procedures, the Wall government is still under an information lockdown on the details.

At issue is the case of former Regina Correctional Centre inmate Brock Wiebe, who was serving time for sexual assault and assault with a weapon when he was mistakenly released 71 days early.

The matter first surfaced during question period at the legislature on October 29, 2009, when NDP Corrections, Public Safety, and Policing critic Kevin Yates asked Corrections Minister Yogi Huyghebaert if he would confirm that a dangerous sex offender was unlawfully at large from the correctional system in Saskatchewan. Huyghebaert denied knowing anything.

“I have no knowledge of that at this point in time. If the member would like to pass some information over to me, I will definitely look into it,” he said.

But when Yates presented details about Wiebe’s case the minister suddenly changed his story:

Mr. Yates: — “Mr. Speaker, if the minister was doing his job, he would know that Brock Wiebe, a dangerous sexual offender, has been unlawfully at large from the Regina Correctional Centre since July 30 at 5:23 p.m. — three months ago. He was serving time for sexual assault, assault with a weapon, and obstruct of a police officer among other charges. Why has the news media not been informed? Why have the people of Saskatchewan not been informed that this dangerous offender from Swift Current, Saskatchewan is at large?”

The Speaker: — “I recognize the Minister Responsible for Corrections and Public Safety.”

Hon. Mr. Huyghebaert: — “Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Now that the member opposite has given me some information that I can work with, I can tell him that I am aware of the particular case, that the member was accidentally released on probation. He was released 71 days early. Mr. Wiebe followed all of the conditions of his probation. He is now living in Calgary. We have an address of Mr. Wiebe. We have contacted the police services in Calgary to apprehend.

“One of the reasons that the decision was made not to put it public is — there’s a number of reasons, Mr. Speaker — one of the reasons that we decided and I decided not to make a public announcement of this is because we were under the impression, with the police services, that it might drive Mr. Wiebe underground.”

Huyghebaert’s claim was considered “specious” because Wiebe turned himself in shortly after the news was made public. [Live by promise of civil conduct (StarPhoenix, January 29, 2010)]

On November 2, 2009, Huyghebaert informed the legislature that one government corrections employee had been placed on “administrative leave” and that “a full investigation” would be conducted.

However, according to a one-page Government Services briefing note, dated January 29, 2010, it was three weeks before Corrections, Public Safety, and Policing formally requested outside help.

“On November 23, 2009, Carol Fiedelleck, Executive Director of Adult Corrections requested Risk Management Services at the Ministry of Government Services to investigate the unauthorized release of confidential information to determine who was responsible for the breach,” the document states.

The case had stopped being about Wiebe’s inadvertent release and became about the Wall government launching a vicious witch hunt to find the whistleblower and punish them severely. It didn’t seem to matter if the right person was found just as long as someone paid the price to send a message to civil servants.

On January 28, 2010, the StarPhoenix reported that Yates was grilled by government officials on January 26. Yates said in an interview with reporter James Wood that “hard-core interrogation tactics” were used.

He said he only agreed to speak to Glynn Mitchell and Hal Zorn (a former Regina police officer) of the protective services branch of the Ministry of Government Services to tell them the person they had suspended was not the source of the leak.

“It was like an intense criminal interrogation. They were twisting things around, putting things in your mouth,” Yates said.

“The type of tactics they used, and I know they used this with a number of civil servants as well, I believe are inappropriate. They’re draconian.”

Yates said the investigators insisted they had “ironclad evidence” against the employee, who has now been off the job for 90 days. But he said the government is punishing the wrong person in a “witch hunt” while trying to send a message to civil servants and MLAs.

“During the interrogations they’re saying, if the individual gets fired it’s my fault and I’m responsible for bringing an issue to the public that shouldn’t be brought forward. Now, is that not intended to make me think about how I would deal with these issues in the future? Not raise a safety issue that was brought to me?

“As a member of the legislature my job is to raise concerns and hold the government accountable for what their policies are. If people are afraid to bring us information that they believe needs to be made public . . . or I’m afraid to bring it forward, then yes, it’s an infringement on that responsibility.”

In the article, Wood also noted that ‘Zorn unsuccessfully approached journalists in the legislature press gallery to ask them for a corrections document provided by the NDP, although the government already had its own copy.’ [Yates says questioning over leak ‘inappropriate, draconian’ (StarPhoenix, January 28, 2010)]

On March 25, 2010, Al Hilton, the deputy minister of corrections, public safety, and policing, told the media that, after a months-long investigation, a provincial corrections employee had been fired for violating several policies of government and legislative responsibilities.

Hilton declined to elaborate on the evidence against the employee because it’s a personnel issue and could affect future arbitration hearings if the employee chooses to fight the dismissal, said the StarPhoenix.

The employee, whose name has not been made public, had been on administrative leave since November. The employee is a “long-serving public servant,” said Hilton.

Yates maintained the Wall government targeted the wrong person.

In an interview with reporter Jeremy Warren, Yates said that the information came from an anonymous source – a person that is not the man who was fired by the government.

“This is very much a political hit,” said Yates.

“This is a political attempt to intimidate the civil service. What’s lost in all this is that the government didn’t follow its own policies when they stood in the house and said they’d let the public know when an offender was at large. This is a real travesty and astounding the government would act in this manner . . . the whole, entire situation.”

Yates learned during the investigation the fired employee first accessed the inmate release information on Oct. 29, but Yates received the information on Oct. 26.

“This is clearly a witch hunt,” said Yates, adding he can’t explain how the government fired the wrong guy.

“I don't know if it makes a difference,” he said. “They were going to get somebody.”

Hilton could not confirm Yates’ dates, citing privacy laws, but said the government did a thorough investigation and did not make the termination decision without solid evidence. [Corrections worker fired over prisoner release leak (StarPhoenix, March 26, 2010)]

Since March 2010, the Wall government has denied five requests made under the province’s freedom of information legislation for records related to the case.

The Ministry of Government Services turned down three access requests for copies of emails and memorandums since January 1, 2010, between risk management director Glynn Mitchell and protective services manager Hal Zorn. The requests were denied on March 4, April 26, and October 28, 2010.

The Ministry of Corrections, Public Safety and Policing denied two requests for copies of the report prepared by Government Services. Those requests were refused on April 26 and October 30, 2010.

In each instance, both ministries violated the Act by not applying section 8, which is mandatory and requires government institutions to give access to as much of the record as can reasonably be severed without disclosing the information to which the applicant is refused access.

The ministries cite section 15 pertaining to law enforcement and investigations as the main reason for refusing access. But only Government Services referred to section 15(1)(c), a discretionary exemption that permits a government institution to refuse access which could “interfere with a lawful investigation or disclose information with respect to a lawful investigation.”

The Saskatchewan Information and Privacy Commissioner has addressed this particular exemption in several reports.

The office defines “lawful investigation” as an investigation that is authorized or required and permitted by law. However, a government institution cannot invoke section 15(1)(c) of the Act unless there is an active and ongoing investigation. [Gary Dickson, Access to Information - Statutory Alternatives (Canadian Bar Association (Saskatchewan) Mid-Winter Meeting, February 2, 2007)]

The access officers at both ministries recently confirmed by email that the investigation is no longer ongoing. Government Services added, “that there is an associated ongoing legal proceeding.” However, they are not able to provide further detail.

This could mean that the person fired by the Wall government earlier this year has filed an arbitration hearing to fight the dismissal.

On November 9, 2010, the Wall government introduced a Bill to protect whistleblowers in the public service.

The new Public Interest Disclosure Act sets the framework for reporting wrongdoing. It also establishes a Public Interest Disclosure Commissioner as an independent Officer of the Legislature, said a provincial government news release.

The Minister responsible for the Public Service Commission, June Draude, said the Act will protect employees from reprisal if they report wrongdoing by government institutions.

The legislation will cover:

▪ Acts or omissions that are contrary to law, public health, safety, welfare and/or protection of the environment;

▪ Gross mismanagement of public funds or assets; and

▪ Knowingly counseling someone to commit a wrongdoing.

“It will apply to employees in all ministries and include the Crown Investment Corporation and Treasury Board Crowns,” Draude said.

This is in line with the definition of government institutions as found in The Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, which includes ministries and Crown corporations. Details of which Crowns and other entities will be covered will be prescribed by Regulation, after the Bill is enacted, the release said.

According to the StarPhoenix, Draude said there would also be a designated person within each ministry to whom whistleblowers could take complaints without fear of reprisal.

The public interest disclosure commissioner will look into allegations and make a recommendation to the appropriate minister, Draude said.

“Every year we will report the number of incidents, and from which ministry they came from, and it’s just an open and accountable process.”

There won’t be a large budget requirement, she said, noting there are three other provinces with similar offices and they sometimes field just a few complaints a year.

The government is considering having the commissioner role as part of the existing office of the ombudsman, she added. [Independent whistleblower officer proposed (StarPhoenix, November 10, 2010)]

Unfortunately, the proposed law has a number of serious flaws.

The commissioner will not have the power to compel the province to do anything. The best that he or she can do is conduct an investigation, prepare a report offering an opinion and reasons for that opinion; and any recommendations they consider appropriate respecting the disclosure and the wrongdoing. [Sec. 21(1)]

Saskatchewan’s information and privacy commissioner is saddled with the same problem.

On September 22, 2010, information commissioner Gary Dickson issued a lengthy report dealing with a case between a private citizen and the City of Saskatoon involving records from 2004 concerning the city’s south downtown redevelopment project (now known as River Landing).

The commissioner’s report recommended the city release several emails to the applicant, but the city refused and walked away. [Complaints backlog prompts criticism of privacy watchdog (StarPhoenix, October 8, 2010)]

Because the recommendations are non-binding there was nothing the commissioner could do. This could easily happen to the new public interest disclosure commissioner.

We already know how the Wall government feels about some non-binding recommendations.

In March 2010, the United Nations International Labour Organization (ILO) issued a ruling in favour of complaints filed by the National Union of Public and General Employees (NUPGE), on behalf of the Saskatchewan Government and General Employees’ Union (SGEU/NUPGE), and the Saskatchewan Federation of Labour, on behalf of more than a dozen other unions in the province, alleging that the Public Service Essential Services Act and changes to the Trade Union Act impede workers from exercising their fundamental right to freedom of association by making it more difficult for workers to join unions, engage in free collective bargaining and exercise their right to strike.

The ILO made six non-binding recommendations for appropriate action by the provincial government. However, former Advanced Education, Employment and Labour (AEEL) Minister Rob Norris brought shame to Saskatchewan by insulting the ILO and dismissing the report.

The Wall government recently submitted its formal response to the ILO’s Committee of Experts respecting the Committee on the Freedom of Association recommendations arguing it has done nothing wrong.

The new whistleblower law is deeply flawed because it also borrows the freedom of information legislation’s definition of ‘government institution.’ This means it will not cover the Legislative Assembly Service or offices of members of the Assembly or members of the Executive Council. [FOIPP, Sec. 2(2)]

So if a whistleblower was to come forward with evidence of wrongdoing by the premier, a cabinet minister or MLA they’re out of luck because they’re exempt.

While the law does cover acts or omissions that are contrary to law, public health, safety, welfare and/or protection of the environment, they must pose “a substantial and specific danger” in order to be considered. In cases that allege mismanagement of funds, it must be “gross” in nature. The proposed Act fails to define these terms.

Another serious problem is that the proposed law adopts section 16(1) of the province’s freedom of information legislation protecting cabinet documents from being disclosed. [Sec. 13(1)]

So if a public servant had knowledge of a wrongdoing that involved the premier or a minister but the only proof was within a cabinet document there’s nothing the whistleblower could do. In such a case, the new law may also provide protection to the government official that prepared the cabinet document in question because its disclosure is not permitted.

Section 7(1) of the new law seems to give government institutions the power to refuse to receive and deal with disclosures by public servants if the permanent head (usually the deputy minister, president or other official in charge of the government institution who is directly responsible to a member of the Executive Council) determines that it is not practical to do so given the size of the government institution for which the permanent head is responsible. However, before making such a determination the permanent head must consult with the commissioner.

Unfortunately, the section does not say whether the commissioner has the authority to reject or overturn such a determination.

Section 16(1) establishes the parameters where, in the commissioner’s opinion, an investigation is not required. Two reasons that can be used are: “(d) the disclosure relates to a matter that results from a balanced and informed decision-making process on a public policy or operational issue,” and “(g) the circumstances of the case do not warrant investigation.”

The new commissioner may or may not ever invoke these clauses, but you can be damn sure that a government institution fighting off a charge of wrongdoing will. Any or every case could result in a war of interpretations.

In the end, a government institution could simply turn around and use any of the reasons listed in section 16 against the commissioner if it doesn’t agree with his or her findings or recommendations.

The Wall government’s whistleblower protection legislation needs to go back to the drawing board for an overhaul.

Wall government refusing to release Minimum Wage Board minutes; axes equal representation for employees and employers on the board

The Saskatchewan Party government’s latest attack on workers occurred this summer when Labour Relations and Workplace Safety Minister Don Morgan announced the minimum wage would remain unchanged until the Minimum Wage Board conducts its next review in 2011.

The stage was also set for the introduction of a “training wage” that would see new entrants to the workforce or people who change jobs discriminated against by paying them less than the minimum wage.

Welcome to the New West, courtesy of Premier Brad Wall.

The despicable assault began on July 9, 2009, when Wall signed an order in council firing the entire minimum wage board and replacing them with business people and friends of the Saskatchewan Party. The new board members are:

▪ Wayne Watts, Saskatoon (Chairperson)
▪ Wayne Sannes, Moose Jaw
▪ Margaret (Peggy) Hasein, Biggar
▪ Judith Riddell, Carlyle
▪ Sandy Ewert, Martensville

Mr. Watts is president of Liquid Capital Prairie Corp. in Saskatoon. According to Saskatchewan Party financial statements filed with Elections Saskatchewan, Watts has contributed $2,452.24 to the party since 2006. He also attended the party’s leader’s dinner at TCU Place in Saskatoon on April 29, 2010. Tickets to the event cost $250.00.

Mr. Sannes and his wife owned Wayne & Laverne’s Pizza & Steak House in Moose Jaw. The restaurant closed in March 2008 after over 20 years of business.

Ms. Hasein and her husband Daryl own The Independent Printers Ltd. and publish a weekly newspaper, the Biggar Independent. On January 18, 2010, the Wall government announced that Mr. Hasein had been appointed to the Saskatchewan Rate Review Panel.

Ms. Riddell is the executive director of the Cornerstone Regional Economic Development Authority, based in Carlyle.

Ms. Ewert, a registered nurse, was the Saskatchewan Party candidate for the Saskatoon Nutana riding in the 2003 provincial election.

According to a redacted ministry briefing note dated January 18, 2010, the board chair is paid $230 per day and members receive $155 plus expenses at current government rates.

In the past, the composition of the minimum wage board has included equal representation from business and labour. In 2007, employers were represented by Clarke Curtis and Luisa Graybiel, and the employees by Carol Cisecki and Dan Wirl. The chairperson was John Yeo.

The new board’s report does not identify the business and labour representatives. With that in mind, an email was sent to Labour Relations and Workplace Safety requesting that information.

Mike Carr, the deputy minister of labour relations and workplace safety, responded in a letter dated November 18, 2010, stating:

“Section 15 of the Labour Standards Act directs that the Minimum Wage Board consist of five members, one of whom will serve as Chair. The legislation states that at least two of the Board members must be female.

“Beyond those measures, however, there are no other specific requirements with respect to the composition of the Board. For example, there is no provision in the legislation for equal representation for employees and employers on the Board.

“The current members of the Board were appointed to act in the public interest and are charged with serving the people of Saskatchewan to the best of their abilities.”

The January 18 briefing note shows that the Wall government cared little about the concept of equal representation saying the existence of the long standing practice was only “by tradition (not legislation).”

The Wall government stripped the process of any sense of fairness, stacked the board in its favour, and didn’t bother to tell the public.

It should be noted that Mike Carr was appointed (without competition) associate deputy minister of Advanced, Education, Employment and Labour on March 6, 2008, at a salary of $155,000 per year. On June 29, 2010, he was appointed deputy minister of labour relations and workplace safety at a yearly salary of $192,036, a 23.89 per cent increase after just 2 years and 4 months on the job.

Prior to his appointments, Carr was co-chair of the Saskatchewan Chamber of Commerce’s human resources committee. He is also a contributor to the Saskatchewan Party.

Under Section 15 of The Labour Standards Act, the board’s mandate includes reviewing Saskatchewan’s minimum wage every two years, which currently sits at $9.25 an hour.

On September 25, 2009, the province announced that a review of the minimum wage was underway and invited the public to submit their opinions and concerns by October 30, 2009.

The board submitted its report (dated December 11, 2009) to former Advanced Education, Employment and Labour (AEEL) Minister Rob Norris on December 30, 2009. The Wall government sat on the results for ten months. Only after public criticism were they released on July 30, 2010, the Friday of a long weekend. The board made the following recommendations:

1) That the minimum wage be maintained at its current rate of $9.25 per hour, until the next review;

2) That further consideration be given to the indexation of the minimum wage and that a more extensive review of the methodology for indexation be undertaken with recommendations to be presented to the Minister in 2010;

3) That a training wage of 90 per cent of the minimum wage be instituted, rounded up to the nearest 5 cents. The training wage would apply for the first 6 months of employment with the employer. This rate would only apply to employees hired after the implementation of the regulation; and,

4) That the Government consider alternate ways to assist low wage earners through changes in the following: Basic personal income tax exemption; limit the clawback of social assistance benefits; and, promotion of continuing education.

The Wall government adopted the first recommendation; ordered the board to conduct a more extensive review of the second and report back by December 31, 2010; and, was silent on the third and fourth recommendations.

The “training wage” is a nasty piece of business that the Canadian Federation of Independent Business has been after for a long time. The organization has a very close working relationship with the Saskatchewan Party. Now that the idea is on the table it’s only a matter of time before the Wall government endorses it.

As far as the Wall government is concerned, poor people in Saskatchewan make enough money.

“We have implemented significant increases in the minimum wage since we came to office,” said Morgan in a July 30, 2010, news release. “Low income earners have also benefited from changes in income tax policy with 80,000 people being removed from the tax rolls.”

As a minister, Morgan receives an annual salary of $132,904. As a full-time hourly wage that works out to $63.89 per hour, almost seven times the minimum wage.

On October 1, 2010, the Wall government turned down an access to information request for copies of the agendas and minutes to any meetings of the minimum wage board that occurred between September 1, 2009, and December 31, 2009.

“Access to the records relevant to your request is denied, pursuant to section 17(1)(f)(i) of The Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act,” said Mike Carr, the deputy minister of Labour Relations and Workplace Safety.

This section of the Act pertains to advice from officials and is a discretionary exemption. It permits government institutions to refuse access to a record that could reasonably be expected to disclose agendas or minutes of a board, commission, Crown corporation or other government body.

In response to a follow-up query, the ministry’s privacy officer confirmed in an email on October 19, 2010, that eight documents totaling 11 pages are being withheld in their entirety. What is the Wall government hiding?

There are significant differences between the latest minimum wage board report and the last one conducted in 2007 under the previous Saskatchewan NDP government.

The 2007 review was guided by a set of four ‘objectives,’ two of which were: Review statistical, economic and social data that pertain to the minimum wage; and, consider the social and economic needs of the minimum wage worker.

The 2009 review, on the other hand, was guided by three ‘principles’: Sustainability, competitiveness, and prosperity. It appears the board did not concern itself with such things as reviewing social data or considering the social and economic needs of low wage earners.

The Watts-led board was instead asked to “ensure that the minimum wage guarantees the people of Saskatchewan realize the benefit of active participation in a growing economy.” The board, in its report, never gets around to explaining what this gobbledygook really means or how its recommendations achieve this principle.

What is known, however, is that poverty and food bank usage in Saskatchewan is escalating, the gap between rich and poor is among the largest of all provinces, level of child poverty is appalling, Northern Saskatchewan is one of the five poorest regions in the country, the Salvation Army in Saskatoon is having to turn people away due to lack of capacity, and apartment rental rates in Saskatoon and Regina have skyrocketed.

The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation’s (CMHC) rental market report for October 2006 shows that the average rate for one and two bedroom apartments in Saskatoon was $496 and $608 respectively. In Regina, it was $515 and $619. As of April 2010, those same units were going for $747 and $923 in Saskatoon; and $717 and $858 in Regina.

A single person working 40 hours a week at the current minimum wage would gross $1,603 a month and use 46.6 per cent of that to rent a one bedroom apartment in Saskatoon. In Regina, it would be slightly lower at 44.7 per cent.

In October 2006, when the minimum wage in Saskatchewan was $7.55 an hour, a single person earning the minimum was using 37.9 per cent and 39.3 per cent of their monthly gross income ($1,308) on rent in Saskatoon and Regina.

The Wall government’s answer to fighting poverty is to kick people when they’re down.

In its report, the Watts-led minimum wage board fails to explain where the principles that guided their deliberations originated.

The answer is they came from former Advanced Education, Employment and Labour Minister Rob Norris in a two-page letter to Watts dated September 8, 2009, a copy of which was obtained through an access to information request. The board adopted the Wall government’s principles word for word.

The Wall government’s insistence on using competitiveness as a key factor killed any chance of a minimum wage increase. It was cited by the board as the main reason for kiboshing the idea.

“There is a concern that a change in the minimum wage at this time could have a negative impact on the economy,” the board said in recommending no increase.

The concern was from the business community. With this bunch, no time is ever the right time to hike the minimum wage.

The board’s emphasis was on Western Canadian competitiveness, something that was absent from the 2007 report.

“Saskatchewan’s minimum wage is higher than the other western Provinces. This has a direct impact on the competitiveness of Saskatchewan businesses with their counterparts in the other provinces,” the report states on page 11.

With Alberta’s minimum wage stalled at $8.80 per hour and British Columbia’s at a disgraceful $8.00 per hour, there was no hope that Saskatchewan’s rate would be viewed as being competitive by the pro-business board. Until the westernmost provinces match or surpass Saskatchewan’s rate the likelihood of the right wing Wall government increasing the minimum wage any time soon is remote at best.

Only Manitoba, which increased its minimum wage on October 1, 2010, to $9.50 an hour, is higher than Saskatchewan’s, but the Wall government’s obsession with competitiveness has always been focused on Alberta and British Columbia.

Another big difference between the current and previous reports is that in 2007 the board not only reviewed the written submissions to identify the concerns of stakeholders and options for addressing minimum wage issues, it also “considered emerging social and economic issues by analyzing statistical data.” Through this process the board identified seven trends. The following are the top three:

Trend Number One: “The rationale for opposing an increase was the high cost of operating a business. An increase will cause a negative impact on hiring part-time employees and an increase will cause layoffs of minimum wage workers.”

The board found that a large proportion of total minimum wage earners work in two sectors: the accommodation and foodservices industry and the retail sales industry, and noted that sales volumes in these industries rose approximately 100% from 1991 to 2006. Whereas, the minimum wage increased by approximately 50%.

Trend Number Two: “Government should raise the basic exemption of low-income earners thereby eliminating the claw back effect of taxation on the minimum wage and low-wage earners.”

The board found that while every taxpayer would benefit from an increase in the personal exemption, figures show that very few low-income workers would benefit. An increase to the basic personal income tax exemption is of no benefit to single parents and one-income families. “In addition, tax revenues for the province would fall by an estimated $53.6 million for every $1,000 increase in the personal exemption. The conclusion is that increasing the personal exemption is not a very good way of helping low-income workers,” the board said.

Trend Number Three: “An increase to the minimum wage would reduce the number of jobs and the number of hours available to minimum wage workers.”

According to a Sask Trends Monitor study prepared for the board, “there is no obvious relationship between the number of paid workers in the retail trade sector and increases in the minimum wage.” The study also states, “Increases in the minimum wage during the 1990s also had no observable impact on the number of paid workers in the accommodation and foodservices sector.”

The board noted that two increases in 2002 may have contributed to employment declines in restaurants in 2003 and 2004, but this coincided with more restrictive smoking regulations.

“Hence, over time there does not appear to be verifiable evidence that minimum wage increases have resulted in employment losses in the two main sectors of the economy with minimum wage workers,” the board said.

The board also found that after numerous minimum wage increases between 1999 and 2006, the average employment rate provincially, and in the accommodation and foodservices sector, grew.

By contrast, the Watts-led board in 2009 ignored these types of trends altogether. It appears no effort was made to update the previous board’s findings. The board instead kept its analysis to a minimum, giving blanket endorsement to the business community’s demands that the provincial government leave the minimum wage alone and focus on raising the basic personal income tax exemption.

“The Board recognizes that the 2008 increase of the basic personal income tax exemption by $4,000 was a positive impact on the provincial economy,” the 2009 report states.

“This increase resulted in 80,000 low income tax payers no longer paying income tax. In addition, the increased exemption resulted in more personal disposable income of approximately $440 per taxable individual.”

For low income earners, the extra $440 a year is more than likely gobbled up by outstanding bills or rising costs.

The board added: “It is the Board’s belief that further consideration of the benefit of increasing the basic personal income tax exemption should be contemplated to ensure that more money is in the hands of residents of the Province which in turn will stimulate the economy.”

The Watts-led board steers clear of explaining how the provincial treasury is supposed to absorb another hit.

The so-called ‘historic’ tax cuts announced by Premier Brad Wall on October 21, 2008, were retroactive for 2008 and cost the provincial government an estimated $334 million in that fiscal year and about $300 million thereafter.

Depleting the province’s fiscal capacity reduces its ability to finance important public programs. But then again, that’s what the business community wants. Less programs and services mean less government.

The justification for freezing the minimum wage, which has increased 16.3 per cent since January 1, 2008, is that it has risen faster than the rate of inflation.

Peter Gilmer, the Regina Anti-Poverty Ministry’s executive director, says that line of thinking is faulty.

“That argument is based on a premise that ignores [the fact] that, for two decades, the provincial minimum wage fell further and further behind the provincial standard of living and the low-income cut-off line. It’s only since 2005 that [the Province] has been in a process where the government committed itself to an approach to linking the minimum wage to the low-income cut-off line.” [Just like old times (Planet S Magazine, August 12, 2010)]

It’s interesting to note that when Macleans revealed last year that in the past 12 years, there’s been a 444 per cent salary increase for Canada’s top CEOs, there were no outcries from the business community.

Analysis by Susan Mohammad and Duncan Hood showed that the top 10 earners collected a total of $60.7 million in 1995 — by 2007, that number had jumped to $330.3 million. For example, Paul Desmarais, CEO of Power Corp, made more than $5 million in 1995; in 2007, his take-home was more than $29 million. [Cashing in: Canada’s CEO salary surge (Macleans, May 1, 2009)]

Nope. Not a peep out of the CFIB, Saskatchewan Chamber of Commerce, Saskatchewan Business Council or North Saskatoon Business Association on that story. They save their energy for beating up on the employees of the businesses they represent.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

The following summarizes information contained in the submissions made by various business and industry lobby groups to the minimum wage board:

Canadian Federation of Independent Business – Saskatchewan Office
▪ no minimum wage increase
▪ no indexing of the minimum wage
▪ introduce a “training wage”
▪ increase basic personal income tax exemption

Saskatchewan Business Council
▪ no minimum wage increase
▪ increase basic personal income tax exemption

Retail Council of Canada – Manitoba/Saskatchewan Office
▪ no minimum wage increase
▪ no indexing of the minimum wage
▪ increase basic personal income tax exemption

Saskatchewan Chamber of Commerce
▪ no minimum wage increase
▪ no indexing of the minimum wage
▪ increase basic personal income tax exemption

North Saskatoon Business Association
▪ no minimum wage increase
▪ increase basic personal income tax exemption

Canadian Restaurant and Foodservices Association*
▪ no minimum wage increase
▪ introduce wage differentials for trainees and tipped servers
* The CRFA is not listed in the Minimum Wage Board’s report as having made a submission, but in a news release on August 19, 2010, the lobby group said it met with the board in late 2009 “to encourage a wage freeze, as well as wage differentials for trainees and tipped servers.”

Letter denying access to minimum wage board agendas and minutes

Premier Brad Wall fires minimum wage board

Saskatchewan Conservative MP’s shameful behaviour continues; StarPhoenix potash flip-flop; Harper, not Clement, made final decision: Globe and Mail

BHP Billiton lobbyist registry communication report

Saskatchewan Conservative MP’s continue to embarrass themselves in the aftermath of Industry Minister Tony Clement’s decision on November 3, 2010, to reject BHP Billiton’s $38.6 US billion bid to take over Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan.

In a statement, Clement said he was not satisfied that the proposed transaction is likely to be of net benefit to Canada.

“I came to this decision after a careful and rigorous review of the proposed transaction. BHP Billiton has 30 days to make any additional representations and submit any undertakings.

“At the end of that period, I will make a final decision.”

Clement noted that confidentiality provisions of the Investment Canada Act prohibit him “from discussing specifics of an ongoing case” and that he “will provide an explanation of the reasons behind my final decision at the time that decision is made.”

BHP Billiton issued a news release acknowledging that Clement advised the company it “has 30 days or such further period as may be agreed to make further representations and undertakings to the Minister with respect to the Offer.”

“BHP Billiton is disappointed, but continues to believe that the Offer is of net benefit to Saskatchewan, New Brunswick and Canada. BHP Billiton will continue to cooperate with the Minister and the Investment Review Division of Industry Canada and will review its options,” the release said.

The Globe and Mail’s Shawn McCarthy reported that despite Clement’s office insisting that he alone would make the decision; multiple sources close to government say Prime Minister Stephen Harper will certainly have the final word. [Potash shares wobble on uncertainty over bid (Globe and Mail, November 2, 2010)]

Saskatchewan Conservative MP’s remained in hiding, saying nary a word, right up until the bitter end.

“The “Saskatchewan 13” have so far refused to comment on BHP Billiton Ltd’s proposed takeover of Potash Corp., but they will be forced to defend it – with their jobs on the line – in the next election campaign should it be approved. And the opposition is salivating over the prospect,” the Globe and Mail said in a story on the potential political fallout.

“Rookie MP Kelly Block won Saskatoon-Rosetown-Biggar by a mere 262 votes over New Democrat Nettie Wiebe in 2008, and would appear to have the most to lose politically if Ottawa allows the takeover. A decision to block the deal would, conversely, boost Ms. Block’s hopes for re-election against a tough opponent.” [The political calculus in Saskatchewan (Globe and Mail, November 1, 2010)]

The disappearing act continued after Clement’s announcement when the StarPhoenix’s James Wood reported that, “Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz, the province’s senior Tory, and Saskatoon’s four Conservative MPs did not return messages seeking comment.” [‘Canada works’: Wall (StarPhoenix, November 4, 2010)]

In a “potash postmortem,” Leader-Post political columnist Murray Mandryk said the province’s MP’s “likely are getting too much credit” and the Saskatchewan NDP “not enough.”

Mandryk nailed the AWOL MP’s with this observation: “There is absolutely no evidence or any indication that Saskatchewan’s 13 Conservatives, who hid throughout this bid evaluation process, played any role.” [Sky didn’t fall, after all (StarPhoenix, November 5, 2010)]

Mandryk didn’t pull any punches in a column the previous day describing the final hours before Clement’s announcement when he painted the province’s Conservative MP’s as “unquestionably clueless and irrelevant to the very last moment.”

Mandryk added: “Scurrying into federal caucus early Wednesday, most only said: “No comment.” And the ones that did say anything offered nothing other than a frightful display of stupidity.

“Consider this gem Saskatoon–Humboldt MP Brad Trost offered reporters Wednesday morning: “Having heard this morning that Wall may have changed his position, I’m not sure what Brad Wall wants.” Huh? Wall changed his position when? You’re not sure what he wants?

“What it did show, however, is that this was not a harmonious, cohesive bunch with a single Saskatchewan message.” [Be thankful right decision made (StarPhoenix, November 4, 2010)]

Even more pathetic is Regina–Lumsden–Lake Centre MP Tom Lukiwski — with the StarPhoenix editorial board coming to his defense — crying that legal constraints are preventing MP’s from speaking publicly on the proposed takeover.

“We have been fully engaged on this file in Ottawa over the course of the last three months but because of the laws governing both the Securities Act and Investment Canada Act we really have been restricted from making any public commentary on it and that’s just the way the law is,” Lukiwski told Leader-Post reporter Angela Hall on November 4, 2010.

“I and my colleagues had several meetings with (Federal Industry Minister Tony) Clement and we certainly passed along all of the commentary that we were hearing from our constituents back home.”

Lukiwski’s lame excuse was blown out of the water when it was revealed that Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz, the MP for Battlefords–Lloydminster, made this comment in the House of Commons earlier in the day: “Having someone different mine it (crop nutrient potash) certainly does make a difference in that Australia is a major marketer of a lot of the same foodstuffs that Canada is. We’re a volume producer -- so are they,” he said.

“And for them to be able to go to the Indias and Chinas of the world and say, ‘We now control your fertilizer, too,’ I think, would have had a very detrimental effect.”

Ritz’s office later issued a statement of clarification that said any comments on factors that were considered are only speculation. [MPs say they spoke on takeover (StarPhoenix, November 5, 2010)]

So in other words, MP’s are free to speculate.

Incredibly, the StarPhoenix tried to defend MP’s in a November 5, 2010, editorial saying a more open Investment Act process would “have allowed Saskatchewan’s 13 Conservative MPs, who were roundly criticized for failing to aggressively promote the interests of the province, to lobby more openly on behalf of their constituents. Although ostensibly legally bound to remain quiet for 30 days, the MPs finally found their voice on Thursday as they railed against their critics and opposition politicians.

“It was their work behind the scenes, not the pressure from the likes of sole Saskatchewan Liberal MP Ralph Goodale, that turned the tide, insisted Regina Conservative MP Tom Lukiwski. Maybe so.

“A skeptical province graciously offers its gratitude.” [Investment act revamp needed for credibility (StarPhoenix, November 5, 2010)]

The StarPhoenix and Leader-Post failed its reader’s by not checking into Lukiwski’s claim. Had they done so, they would have found that it was bogus.

Section 36 of the Investment Canada Act relates to the disclosure of privileged information. Under section 36(1), all information obtained by Industry Canada in the course of the administration of the Act is confidential, and cannot be disclosed to a third party.

The key phrase here is privileged information. MP’s would certainly be free to talk about the issue provided they didn’t reveal any confidential details.

The same can be said for Saskatchewan’s Securities Act, which ensures the securities market is fair and protects the investing public. It is administered by the Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission - Securities Division.

Sections 15(1) and 152.1(1) speak to confidentiality and the non-disclosure of information, testimony, evidence, witness names, internal reports and records of the Commission. Again, common sense would prevail. Don’t reveal privileged information. Anything else would seem fair game. An experienced MP like Lukiwski would know this, but unfortunately he instead chose to mislead people into thinking he was not allowed to say anything at all.

The real reason for the MP’s silence is likely because they were told to keep their mouths shut by the Prime Minister’s Office.

The StarPhoenix’s support of the Saskatchewan Party government’s decision to oppose the BHP Billiton takeover bid is a complete reversal from two months ago.

Back on August 28, 2010, the editorial board blasted the Wall government for meddling in private business.

“If the Saskatchewan government believes it knows best how to manage a potash company, it should buy or build one,” the newspaper said.

“Otherwise -- and there is strong evidence to suggest that those corporations that are in the business and risking their own money can best decide how the industry works -- the Saskatchewan Party government should butt out of whatever deal BHP Billiton or any other potash company wants to make with primarily foreign investors.”

The editorial went on to say that Wall’s desire to see BHP commit to selling off-shore potash through Canpotex, a marketing co-operative that includes Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan Inc., Mosaic Co. and Agrium Inc., was “an illogical position to take from any government but particularly so for one that has opposed the monopoly marketing of Prairie wheat through the Canadian Wheat Board.”

The newspaper even criticized Wall for worrying about jobs: “If the government believes high-quality jobs are essential for urban centres, it should use the proceeds from potash to create its own jobs.”

And then this little nugget: “Mr. Wall shouldn’t be so concerned about the wisdom of placing head office jobs in Saskatoon.”

And finally, the two closing paragraphs: “The provincial government should focus on its responsibilities, regulating and taxing industries in such a way to encourage economic development while protecting the environment and the workers.

“And if it wants to pass useless laws, it should make it illegal in Saskatchewan to claim to be free-market or free-trade capitalists while advocating for government meddling in private business.” [Province should keep hands off any potash deal (StarPhoenix, August 28, 2010)]

The StarPhoenix praised the Conference Board of Canada’s study of Saskatchewan’s potash industry released in early October as “well written” with “common sense” recommendations. The newspaper even downplayed the potential loss of the $2 billion in revenue over the next decade, should BHP’s takeover bid succeed. [Board analysis wise to suggest long-term view (StarPhoenix, October 5, 2010)]

The newspaper’s attitude began to shift right after Premier Brad Wall’s potash speech to the Saskatchewan Chamber of Commerce on October 21, 2010, at the Conexus Arts Centre in Regina, where he formally announced the province would say no to the BHP hostile takeover bid.

The next day, Terence Corcoran, editor of the Financial Post, unloaded a scathing op-ed likening Wall to Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez.

“Did we miss the constitutional change — the one that created the Peoples’ Republic of Saskatchewan, with Brad Wall as el presidente?” Corcoran wrote.

Corcoran’s depiction of Wall and the province was brutal: “the head of some mosquito-ridden developing country” “the new socialist head of state” “a Third World shakedown” “cheap political grandstanding” “banana republic” and “President of Saskatchewan.” [Terence Corcoran: Saskatchewan as banana republic (National Post, October 22, 2010)]

From that moment on, the StarPhoenix seemed to adopt a weird, patriotic, rally around the premier and provincial flag tone. In the end, the newspaper backed both the Wall and Harper government’s decisions.

It’s important to note that the StarPhoenix (and Leader-Post) contributed $10,000 to the Saskatchewan Party in 2000. Granted, that’s a long time ago, but the optics of the donation is still significant. The conservative newspaper waited a long time for the right wing Saskatchewan Party to assume power. The last thing it wants is to see is Wall being dogged by potash issues in next year’s provincial election.

The same goes for the Saskatchewan Chamber of Commerce, another huge supporter of the Saskatchewan Party. The business lobby group was even more invisible during the potash debate than the province’s Conservative MP’s.

The only word from the organization on the subject was a short, mild, statement from CEO Steve McLellan shortly after Wall’s Oct. 21 address: “While the Premiers announcement marks a certain point in the process, the process is still underway. We respect the objectives of both Potash Corp and BHP Billiton are to do what is in the best interests of their shareholders. We also respect the role of the Premier to do what his Government believes is in the best interests of the province.

“However, we believe that the negotiations between the two companies should be left to those companies and any undue interference by government only serves to undermine the jurisdiction’s ability to attract future investment and decreases the confidence of the markets in that jurisdiction.

“The offer is still in play and the decision of the Federal Government is still to come. We have all learned lessons around this process and we hope that no matter what the outcome of the BHP Billiton offer that we use the lessons learned to make Saskatchewan a better place to live, work and invest in the future.”

You can be damn sure that had it been the Saskatchewan NDP that was fighting against BHP, the chamber, along with every other business and industry lobby group in the province, would be marching on the Legislative Building with pitchforks and torches — with the StarPhoenix’s and Leader-Post’s blessing.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE: On October 26, 2010, an email was sent to all Saskatchewan Conservative MP’s asking one simple question: ‘Do you support or oppose BHP Billiton’s takeover proposal.’

At the time of Industry Minister Tony Clement’s announcement on November 3, 2010, no MP had answered the question.

Two responses have so far been received after the deadline.

The first was from Blackstrap MP Lynne Yelich on November 4, 2010: “Yesterday, the Honourable Tony Clement, Minister of Industry announced that he contacted BHP Billiton and informed them that he was not satisfied that their application for the proposed acquisition of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan would be of net benefit to Canada.

“Under the law, BHP Billiton now has thirty days to make further representations to the government. At the end of those thirty days, Minister Clement will make a final decision. Under the Canada Investment Act, the government cannot comment any further on the details of the Minister’s decision until those thirty days have passed.

“As Member of Parliament for Blackstrap, I received many comments from constituents on this matter. I, along with my Saskatchewan colleagues passed the knowledge and concerns of our constituents to Minister Clement.

“Saskatchewan’s natural resources are important economic drivers and we must be careful stewards of these assets. Any deals offered to purchase these resources must be of net benefit to Saskatchewan, and Canada as a whole.

“I appreciate your patience in this matter, as we await the final decision of the Minister.”

The fact remains that Yelich, like many of her colleagues, was silent throughout the entire process.

The second reply was a follow-up message from Saskatoon–Rosetown–Biggar MP Kelly Block on November 5, 2010: “Thank you for your e-mail regarding the proposed takeover of Potash Corp. by BHP Billiton.

“Along with my colleagues from Saskatchewan, I have been listening to your concerns and raising them with the Honourable Tony Clement, the Minister of Industry, to help inform his decision. The Minister sent notice to BHP Billiton indicating that, at this time, he is not satisfied that the proposed transaction is likely to be of net benefit to Canada. According to the Investment Canada Act, BHP Billiton has 30 days, from the date of the decision, to make any additional representations and submit any undertakings. During that time, we are not legally allowed to publicly divulge any of the details surrounding the decision or offer.

“I support the Minister of Industry in his decision and was glad for the opportunity to meet with him on several occasions to share the concerns of my constituents in Saskatoon-Rosetown-Biggar.

“Thank you for expressing your opinions on the matter.

“Working to represent Saskatoon-Rosetown-Biggar is truly an honour. If I can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate in contacting my office.”

Had Block the backbone to speak up before the deadline when it mattered the most her comments would have carried weight and credibility. Supporting the minister after the fact is expected. It’s common knowledge that Prime Minister Stephen Harper is obsessed with control and rules with an iron fist. There’s likely not one Saskatchewan Conservative MP that has the guts to say they disagree with him or the minster.

It should be noted that of all the responses received from MP’s to date, not one has said they were forbidden from commenting on the subject because of legal reasons.

Lastly, details of BHP Billiton’s lobbying efforts in Ottawa to secure federal backing for its takeover bid of PotashCorp are beginning to trickle in.

According to a communications report submitted by BHP CEO Marius Kloppers with Canada’s office of lobbying on November 4, 2010, the Australian-based mining giant met with the Saskatchewan’s 14 MP’s on September 22, 2010. In separate reports filed with the registry, the company also communicated with numerous government officials including Finance Minister Jim Flaherty and House Speaker Peter Milliken.

Unfortunately, BHP brass and Saskatchewan Conservative MP’s (and the Wall government for that matter) failed to make time to meet directly with the owners of the province’s potash, the people of Saskatchewan.

Saskatchewan’s 13 Conservative MP’s avoid answering BHP Billiton takeover question

Faced with controversy over a federal matter affecting Saskatchewan, the province’s 13 Conservative MP’s are doing what they do best — making themselves scarce.

For more than two months now, the future of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan has dominated the news. And yet, with the exception of an isolated quote or two, they have remained invisible.

Some time on November 3, 2010, federal Industry Minister Tony Clement is expected to rule on Australian mining giant BHP Billiton’s $38.6 billion hostile takeover bid of PotashCorp.

The Investment Canada Act, which Clement oversees, requires the government to review any acquisition of control by a foreign investor of a Canadian business with assets of $299-million or more. Under the Act, such a transaction requires approval from the minister and must be shown to be of “net benefit” to Canada.

The Saskatchewan Party government opposes the takeover. In an open letter published in several newspapers across the province on October 23, 2010, Premier Brad Wall cited the potential loss of revenue, jobs, and Canadian influence over a strategic resource as reasons for the decision.

It should be noted, however, that Wall was referring to “the current BHP Billiton takeover proposal.”

This brings back memories of the B.C.-Alberta Trade, Investment and Labour Mobility Agreement (TILMA) and Wall’s declaration on June 28, 2007, that a Saskatchewan Party government would not sign the pact “in its present form.” After he becoming premier, Wall signed the slightly different – and just as bad – New West Partnership Trade Agreement. Could something similar happen with BHP Billiton?

On October 21, 2010, Wall outlined the government’s official position in a speech to the Saskatchewan Chamber of Commerce at the Conexus Arts Centre in Regina. But what he didn’t do was set out conditions by which the BHP Billiton deal could be supported by the provincial government. If Wall has a plan to appease the business community and keep the peace with his friend Prime Minister Stephen Harper he hasn’t told the public.

According to the StarPhoenix, Energy and Resources Minister Bill Boyd and Enterprise Minister Jeremy Harrison [a former Tory MP] were in Ottawa last week, where they met Monday with Conservative Industry Minister Tony Clement and Tuesday with senior Tory cabinet ministers Jim Flaherty and Stockwell Day, Opposition Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff and the province’s sole Liberal MP, Ralph Goodale.

On Tuesday evening, they met with the 13-member Saskatchewan Conservative caucus.

Reporter James Wood noted: ‘The MPs would not comment Tuesday evening following the meeting, providing only a written statement issued by Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz on behalf of Saskatchewan's federal caucus. Ritz would not be interviewed.

“I reminded all in attendance that the Harper government, while remaining very open to international investment, will not rubber stamp foreign investment as the previous Liberal governments did,” wrote Ritz.

Ritz said Clement continues to review the proposed acquisition and it will only be approved if it is of “net benefit” to Canada.’ [Wall claims potash progress in Ottawa (StarPhoenix, October 27, 2010)]

Who is Ritz trying to kid? According to Investment Canada records posted on the Industry Canada website, approximately 200 investment proposals (see list below) requiring review have been approved under the Investment Canada Act since the Harper Conservatives took office in late January 2006. How many of those were rubber-stamped?

Avoiding reporters seems to be a habit of Saskatchewan’s Conservative MP’s.

Wood apparently tried contacting Ritz and Blackstrap MP Lynne Yelich and Saskatchewan Tory caucus chair Ray Boughen on October 20, 2010, but his calls were not returned.

A one-line written statement from Ritz said the government was monitoring the situation closely and any decision will be made in the best interests of Canada, Wood said. [No benefit to takeover: Wall (StarPhoenix, October 21, 2010)]

And even when the odd MP does break from the pack and comment on something, they’re generally so careful with their words that it’s not worth reporting.

On October 26, 2010, an email was sent to all 13 Saskatchewan Conservative MP’s asking one simple question: ‘Do you support or oppose BHP Billiton’s takeover proposal.’

Although some responses were received, as of November 2, 2010, not one Saskatchewan Conservative MP has had the courage to answer the question.

The first to reply was Glenda Eimantas, the legislative assistant to Yorkton-Melville MP Garry Breitkreuz: “Thank you for your letter. I will ensure it is brought to Mr. Breitkreuz’s attention.”

The second reply came from Heather Kelly, the executive assistant to Palliser MP Ray Boughen: “I am writing to acknowledge receipt of your email. Please be assured that your correspondence will be brought to Mr. Boughen’s attention.”

The third and final response to be received on October 26, 2010, was from Vikki Ruby, an assistant to Saskatoon-Humboldt MP Brad Trost: “Thank you for your e-mail message. Due to the high volume of e-mail received, Mr. Trost wishes to identify & respond to those from his constituents.

“If you are a constituent and would like your correspondence identified as such, please re-send your original correspondence with your full mailing address.”

It would appear that Trost has absolutely no interest in hearing from anyone outside his riding – no matter how important the subject.

The next to respond was Saskatoon-Wanuskewin MP Maurice Vellacott on October 27, 2010: “I appreciate your input on this very important matter.

“We continue to monitor this situation closely and any decision made will be in the best interests of Canada.

“Any acquisition by a foreign investor of a Canadian business with assets of $299 million or more is automatically subject to review under the Investment Canada Act.

“The Minister of Industry only approves applications for review where an investment demonstrates that it will provide a net benefit to Canada.‪

“The review process is rigorous, involving consultations with affected provinces, territories and other key stake holders.

“Thanks again for taking the time to write in on this key issue affecting the future of our province and country.”

The email that was sent to Vellacott was not to provide input, but ask an important question, one that he completely ignored. If anything, at least Vellacott understands that potash is a “key issue” that affects the province and the country.

The second email received that day was from Saskatoon-Rosetown-Biggar MP Kelly Block: “Thank you for your correspondence. Your message is important, and I would like to get back to you as soon as possible.

“Due to the high volume of e-mail that my office receives, a full response may take up to two weeks.

“If your enquiry is technical in nature it may require research which would further delay a response.

“Your patience in this regard is greatly appreciated.”

Block’s email reads like a cheap form letter. In the time it took it send the message, a simple yes or no answer to the question could have been provided. In two short years as an MP, Block seems to have mastered the art of not saying anything publicly unless it’s scripted as part of a photo opportunity.

And finally, on November 2, 2010, a follow-up reply from Yorkton-Melville MP Garry Breitkreuz was received: “Thank you for your letter.

“The Government, while remaining very open to international investment, will not rubber stamp foreign investment as the previous Liberal governments did.

“This Government is looking for international investors who are good corporate citizens who honour their commitments, and who have a positive effect on the Canadian economy.

“The Minister of Industry continues to review BHP’s proposed acquisition of Potash Corporation and he will only approve this application if it is likely to be of net benefit to Canada.”

Although Breitkreuz deserves credit for taking the time to respond, he avoided answering the question. In fact, all he did was regurgitate some of what his colleague Battlefords-Lloydminster MP Gerry Ritz told the media following their private meeting on October 26, 2010, with Saskatchewan Party cabinet ministers Bill Boyd and Jeremy Harrison.

For the record, the following Saskatchewan Conservative MP’s have so far failed to respond:

▪ Andrew Scheer, Regina-Qu’Appelle
▪ Gerry Ritz, Battlefords-Lloydminster
▪ Tom Lukiwski, Regina-Lumsden-Lake Centre
▪ Ed Komarnicki, Souris-Moose Mountain
▪ Randy Hoback, Prince Albert
▪ Rob Clarke, Desnethé-Missinippi-Churchill River
▪ David Anderson, Cypress Hills-Grasslands
▪ Lynne Yelich, Blackstrap

Saskatchewan must surely have the weakest, least effective collection of MP’s in the country.






---------------------------------------------------------------

Investment Canada Act decisions since January 2006. The list was compiled from information posted on the Industry Canada website. Approvals involving Saskatchewan are highlighted in yellow.

January 2006

1) Investor: A.O. Smith Corporation, Milwaukee, WI, USA

Canadian Business: GSW Inc. and GSW Water Products Inc., Oakville, ON
Manufacture and distribute building products and water heaters.

---------------------------------------------------------------

2) Investor: Mittal Canada Inc., Contrecoeur, QC, CDA (NET)

Canadian Business: Stelwire Ltd., Hamilton, ON
Manufactures wire and wire products.

---------------------------------------------------------------

3) Investor: Mittal Canada Inc., Contrecoeur, QC, CDA (NET)

Canadian Business: Norambar Inc. and Fers et Métaux Recyclés Ltée, Contrecoeur, QC
Manufacture steel products.

---------------------------------------------------------------

4) Investor: Mittal Canada Inc., Contrecoeur, QC, CDA (NET)

Canadian Business: Stelfil Ltée, Montreal, QC
Manufactures galvanized wire products.

---------------------------------------------------------------

5) Investor: 1209049 Alberta Ltd., Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Kjorlien Enterprises Ltd., Drayton Valley, AB
Provides oil and gas sector fluid transportation services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

6) Investor: PML Acquisition Co., Greenwich, CT, USA

Canadian Business: Papier Masson Ltée, Gatineau, QC
Produces paper and newsprint.

---------------------------------------------------------------

7) Investor: Pentastar Energy Services Ltd., Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Mighty Peace Oil Services Ltd. and Triple G Trucking Ltd., Fort St. John, BC
Provide oil and gas industry heavy equipment transportation services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

8) Investor: ThyssenKrupp Canada Acquisition Inc., Toronto, ON, CDA (GER)

Canadian Business: Québec Cartier Mining Company, Mount Wright and Port-Cartier, QC
Produces iron ore and operates a railroad.

---------------------------------------------------------------

9) Investor: ThyssenKrupp Canada Acquisition Inc., Toronto, ON, CDA (GER)

Canadian Business: Powerlasers Limited, Concord, ON
Manufactures leading-edge laser welding technology for commercial applications.

---------------------------------------------------------------

10) Investor: ThyssenKrupp Canada Acquisition Inc., Toronto, ON, CDA (GER)

Canadian Business: Dofasco Inc., DoSol Galva Limited Partnership and Dofasco Tubular Products Inc., Hamilton, Brantford and Woodstock, ON
Manufacture steel, steel tubes and tubular steel products.

---------------------------------------------------------------

11) Investor: TriCage Merge Corp., San Francisco, CA, USA

Canadian Business: Geac Computer Corporation Limited, Markham, ON
Distributes software.


February 2006

12) Investor: Cello Acquisition Corp., Houston, TX, USA

Canadian Business: Burlington Resources Canada Ltd., Burlington Resources Canada (Hunter) Ltd., Burlington Resources Canada Partnership, Burlington Resources Canada Marketing Ltd. and Burlington Resources Finance Company, Calgary, AB
Explore for and produce oil and gas.

---------------------------------------------------------------

13) Investor: 4313267 Canada Inc., Luxembourg, LUX

Canadian Business: Powerlasers Limited, Concord, ON
Manufactures leading-edge laser welding technology for commercial applications.

---------------------------------------------------------------

14) Investor: 4313267 Canada Inc., Luxembourg, LUX

Canadian Business: Dofasco Inc., Dofasco Tubular Products Inc. and DoSol Galva Limited Partnership, Hamilton, ON
Manufacture steel products.

---------------------------------------------------------------

15) Investor: 4313267 Canada Inc., Luxembourg, LUX

Canadian Business: Quebec Cartier Mining Company, Port-Cartier, QC
Produces iron ore and operates a railroad.

---------------------------------------------------------------

16) Investor: Maple Leaf Heritage Investments Acquisition Corporation, Toronto, ON, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Hudson's Bay Company (including its following Divisions: Home Outfitters, Designer Depot, Fields, Financial Services), Zellers Inc., Baycrest Captive Insurance Company Limited and Heritage General Insurance Company Limited and Heritage General Insurance Company, Toronto, ON
Own and operate various retail stores and outlets, and provide credit and insurance services to customers across Canada.

---------------------------------------------------------------

17) Investor: Robert T. Schmidt, Halifax, NS, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: The Windsor &Hantsport Railway Company Limited, Hantsport, NS
Owns and operates a railroad.


March 2006

18) Investor: GE Money, Mississauga, ON, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Hudson's Bay Company (its Financial Services Business), Scarborough, ON
Provides private label consumer credit cards and related services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

19) Investor: Wynnchurch Capital Partners II, L.P., Lake Forest, IL, USA

Canadian Business: Calyx Transportation Group Inc., Muircart Holdings Inc., Muir's Cartage Limited, Rayson &Powell Limited, Nesco Holdings Inc., Nesel Fast Freight Incorporated, 670150 B.C. Ltd., Muir's International Inc., Minternatco Holdings Inc., NFFCO Holdings Inc., National Fast Freight Inc., ETSCO Holdings Inc., Euroworld Transport System Canada Inc., CCSCO Holdings Inc., ETS Bulk Division Ltd., Creditstone Container Services Inc., Indis Inc. and Transport Gingras Inc.
Provide ground transportation, distribution, freight-forwarding and related services in British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario and Quebec.


April 2006

20) Investor: Plains Marketing Canada, L.P., Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Cactus Lake Pipeline joint venture, Cactus Lake, SK
Provides blended oil and diluent pipeline transportation and related services.


May 2006

21) Investor: General Electric Company, Fairfield, CT, USA

Canadian Business: Zenon Environmental Inc., Zenon Holdings Inc. and Zenon Aboriginal Inc., Oakville, ON
Develop, manufacture and distribute advanced membrane technologies and systems.

---------------------------------------------------------------

22) Investor: Niska Gas Storage Canada ULC, Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: AECO Gas Storage Inc. and AECO Gas Storage Partnership, Calgary, AB
Operate a gas storage and processing facility.

---------------------------------------------------------------

23) Investor: 3128012 Nova Scotia Limited, Grand Cayman, CAY (SAR)

Canadian Business: Fairmont Hotels &Resorts Inc., Canadian Pacific Securities Limited, Canadian Pacific Securities (Ontario) Limited, FHR Investments Inc., Canadian Pacific Charitable Foundation, Chateau Lake Louise Corporation, FHR Real Estate Corporation, FHR Properties Inc., Fairmont Developments Ltd., Réserve de la Petite Nation (Kenauk), 617613 British Columbia Ltd., Banff Springs Hotel Corporation, BSH Leasing Limited Partnership, 4229452 Canada Inc., 3984826 Canada Inc., Chateau Whistler Resort Partnership, 3493814 Canada Inc., Manoir Richelieu Ltd., Canadian Pacific Hotels Management Corporation, Delta Hotel Limited, 588745 Alberta Limited, DGA Hotels Holdings Corporation, Delta Hotel Properties Limited, Fairmont Hotels Inc., Fairmont Spas Inc., Chateau Purchasing Inc., FHIS Hotel Investments (Canada) Inc., FHIW Hotel Investments (Canada) Inc. and Meadowvale Hotel Services Limited, Toronto, ON
Manage hotels and resorts.


June 2006

24) Investor: Advantage Energy Income Fund, Calgary, AB, CDA (AUS)

Canadian Business: Ketch Resources Trust and Ketch Resources Ltd., Calgary, AB
Explore for, develop, acquire and produce petroleum and natural gas.

---------------------------------------------------------------

25) Investor: GMACCH Investor LLC, New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: GMAC Commercial Mortgage of Canada, Limited, GMAC Commercial Mortgage Resources Canada, Limited, Hemisphere I Limited, Hemisphere II Limited and GMAC Commercial Holding Capital Markets (Canada) Corp., Toronto, ON
Provide commercial real estate loans and services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

26) Investor: Shell Canada Limited, Calgary, AB, CDA (NET)

Canadian Business: BlackRock Ventures Inc. and Discovery Royalty Corporation, Calgary, AB
Explore for, develop and produce heavy oil.

---------------------------------------------------------------

27) Investor: Thunder FZE, Dubai, EMI

Canadian Business: P&O Ports Canada Inc., Vancouver, BC
Operates a container terminal and provides stevedoring services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

28) Investor: Thunder FZE, Dubai, EMI

Canadian Business: Douglasdale Developments and Douglasdale Estates, Calgary, AB
Provide property development services.


July 2006

29) Investor: FedEx National LTL, Inc., Memphis, TN, USA

Canadian Business: Watkins Canada Express Inc. and Watkins Equipment &Terminals Canada Inc., Toronto, ON
Provide LTL transportation and related services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

30) Investor: Transco Energy Services Ltd., Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Schell Equipment Ltd., Calgary, AB
Provides oilfield equipment transportation and installation services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

31) Investor: Xstrata Canada Inc., Zug, SWI (UK)

Canadian Business: Falconbridge Limited, Toronto, ON
Produces copper, nickel, zinc and aluminum.


August 2006

32) Investor: Koch Nitrogen Fertilizer Holding, Inc., Wichita, KS, USA

Canadian Business: Simplot Canada Limited, Brandon, MB
Manufactures and distributes fertilizers.

---------------------------------------------------------------

33) Investor: Ryder Truck Rental Canada Ltd., Mississauga, ON, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Roadex Transport Ltd. and Reagens Canada Ltd., Woodbridge, ON
Provide transportation services.


September 2006

34) Investor: Eimskip Atlas Canada, Inc., Garden City, NY, USA (ICE)

Canadian Business: Atlas Cold Storage Income Trust, Atlas Cold Storage Holdings Inc., Atlas Cold Storage Canada Limited, Atlas Distribution Services Limited and Atlas Cold Storage Midwest Limited, Toronto, ON
Provide food industry refrigerated storage, transportation and logistics services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

35) Investor: Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., Houston, TX, USA

Canadian Business: PEG Canada, L.P. (its Rangeland Pipeline System), Calgary, AB
A pipeline system.

---------------------------------------------------------------

36) Investor: Pengrowth Corporation and Pengrowth Energy Trust, Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Esprit Exploration Ltd. and Esprit Energy Trust, Calgary, AB
Explore for and produce oil and gas.

---------------------------------------------------------------

37) Investor: Rome Acquisition Corp., Atlanta, GA, USA

Canadian Business: Royal Group Technologies Limited and its following subsidiaries: Royal Group Technologies Inc., Crown Plastics Extrusions Co., Boncor Building Products Co., Dominion Plastics Co., Dynast Plastics Co., Imperial Plastics Co., Prince Plastics Co., Regal Plastics Co., Royal Dynamics Co., Royal Group Resources Co., Royal Machine Manufacturing Co., Royal Outdoor Plastics Co., Royal Pipe Co., Royal Plastics Co., Royal R&D Centre Co., RoyalBond Co., Royal Group Technologies (Quebec) Inc., Les Plastiques P.V.C. Montréal Ltée, Thermoplast Inc., Royal Window Coverings (USA) L.P., Royal Flex-Lox Pipe Limited, Le-Ron Plastics Inc., Royal Concrete Encased Technologies Inc., Royal Polymers Limited and Reagens Canada Inc., Woodbrige, ON
Through its subsidiaries, manufactures, distributes and retails innovative, plastic home improvement, consumer and construction products throughout Canada.


October 2006

38) Investor: CVRD Canada Inc., Toronto, ON, CDA (BRA)

Canadian Business: Inco Limited, Inco Technical Services Limited and Voisey's Bay Nickel Company Limited, Toronto, ON
Operate metal mines, mills and smelters in Ontario, Newfoundland and Labrador, Manitoba, and world-wide.

---------------------------------------------------------------

39) Investor: CTOE LLC, Toronto, ON, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Elk Falls Pulp and Paper Limited, Catalyst Paper Finance Limited, Catalyst Pulp Operations Limited, Catalyst Pulp Sales Inc., Catalyst Pulp and Paper Sales Inc., Pacifica Papers Sales Ltd. and Pacifica Poplars Ltd., Vancouver, BC
Manufacture various newsprint and specialty papers.

---------------------------------------------------------------

40) Investor: 1252986 Alberta ULC, Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: ATI Technologies Inc., ATI Technologies Distribution Inc. and ATI International Inc., Markham, ON
Manufacture and distribute graphic chips and related products.

---------------------------------------------------------------

41) Investor: Silver 2501 Canada Inc., Toronto, ON, CDA (JPN)

Canadian Business: Sleeman Breweries Ltd., The Sleeman Brewing &Malting Co. Ltd., 841412 Alberta Ltd., 841419 Alberta Ltd., West Coast Beverage Distributions Ltd., Alberta Distributors Alliance Inc., Okanagan Spring Brewery Leasing Ltd., Sleeman Unibroue Inc., Beerex Distribution Inc. and 3945294 Canada Inc., Guelph, ON
Brew and distribute beer.

---------------------------------------------------------------

42) Investor: Wintergames Acquisition ULC, Halifax, NS, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Intrawest Corporation, Blackcomb Skiing Enterprises Limited Partnership, Whistler Mountain Resort Limited Partnership, Whistler Heli-Skiing Ltd., Whistler Heli-Retail Ltd., Whistler Heli-Boarding Ltd., 379192 British Columbia Ltd., Intrawest Mountain Resorts Ltd., Whistler &Blackcomb Mountain Resorts Limited, Intrawest/Taluswood Development Ltd., Peak to Creek Lodging Company, Blackcomb Mountain Development Ltd., Taluswood Joint Venture, Mountain Employment Company Ltd. and Storied Places (Whistler) Ltd., Whistler, BC
Own and operate ski resorts and provide real estate development and property management services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

43) Investor: Wintergames Acquisition ULC, Halifax, NS, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Mt. Tremblant Reservations Inc., Le Sommet Property Management Inc., Mont Tremblant Resorts and Company Limited Partnership, Mont Tremblant Resort Inc., 4023490 Canada Inc., St. Bernard and Company Limited Partnership, Johannsen-Deslauriers Limited Partnership, 291094 Canada Inc., Château MT Inc. and 3116808 Canada Inc., Mont-Tremblant, QC
Operate a ski resort and provide real estate development and property management services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

44) Investor: Wintergames Acquisition ULC, Halifax, NS, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Silvertip Lodge Inc., Silvertip, BC
Operates a lodge.

---------------------------------------------------------------

45) Investor: Wintergames Acquisition ULC, Halifax, NS, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Canadian Mountain Holidays Inc., Columbia Mountains, BC
Provides heliskiing and helihiking services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

46) Investor: Wintergames Acquisition ULC, Halifax, NS, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Alpine Helicopters Ltd., Alpine Aerotech Ltd., Tower Ranch Development Partnership and Tower Ranch Holding Corporation, Kelowna, BC
Provide helicopter charter, repair and maintenance services and real estate development services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

47) Investor: Wintergames Acquisition ULC, Halifax, NS, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: IW Resorts Limited Partnership and Toby Creek Utilities Co. Ltd., Panorama, BC
Own and operate a ski resort.

---------------------------------------------------------------

48) Investor: Wintergames Acquisition ULC, Halifax, NS, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Intrawest Golf Management (Canada) Ltd. and 596453 British Columbia Ltd., Pitt Meadows, BC
Own and operate a golf course.

---------------------------------------------------------------

49) Investor: Wintergames Acquisition ULC, Halifax, NS, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: IROC 2004-A Receivables Finance Corporation, Playground Real Estate Inc., Playground Real Estate Ltd., Intrawest Resort Finance Corporation and Westrain Holdings Ltd., Vancouver, BC
Provide financing, financial and sales and marketing services for their group resorts.


November 2006

50) Investor: DBO Holdings, Inc., Washington, DC, USA

Canadian Business: Atlas Tube Inc., Harrow, ON
Manufactures heavy construction steel tubes used for buildings, bridges and other structures.

---------------------------------------------------------------

51) Investor: Louis No. 3 Limited, London, UK

Canadian Business: TNT Canada Inc., Brampton, ON
Provides transportation and logistical services.


December 2006

52) Investor: Laidlaw Transit Ltd., Burlington, ON, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Langdon's Coach Lines Co. Limited, King City, ON
Provides school bus transportation and bus charter services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

53) Investor: MS Infrastructure I Funding LP, New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: CP Ships Limited (its Montreal Gateway Terminal business), Montreal, QC
Operates marine container terminals.

---------------------------------------------------------------

54) Investor: 6461433 Canada Limited, Toronto, ON, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Halterm Limited, Halifax, NS
Operates a marine container terminal and cargo handling facility.


January 2007

55) Investor: AM Holdings L.P., New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: Alter Moneta Trust, Alter Moneta Corporation and Finloc 2000 Inc., Longueuil, QC
Provide equipment financing services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

56) Investor: AM Holdings L.P., New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: Lutex Leasing Inc., Saint-Laurent, QC
Provides vehicle leasing services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

57) Investor: John Laing Investments Abbotsford Ltd., Toronto, ON, CDA (UK)

Canadian Business: AHA Holdings Ltd. and AHA Access Health Abbotsford Ltd., Vancouver, BC
Build and operate a hospital and cancer centre.

---------------------------------------------------------------

58) Investor: 1275708 Alberta Ltd. and Pengrowth Corporation, Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: 1265702 Alberta ULC, 1265704 Alberta ULC, 1265706 Alberta ULC and 1265707 Alberta ULC, Calgary, AB
ConocoPhillips subsidiaries which explore for, develop and produce oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids in certain Areas of Alberta and Saskatchewan.

---------------------------------------------------------------

59) Investor: RR Acquisition Holding LLC, New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: RailTex Canada, Inc., Cape Breton &Central Nova Scotia Railway Ltd., Goderich-Exeter Railway Company Limited, RailLink Canada Ltd. and RL Funding Corp., North Bay, ON
Provide rail transportation services.


February 2007

60) Investor: HCP Acquisition Inc., Halifax, NS, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Calpine Power Income Fund, Calpine Commercial Trust, Calpine Power, L.P., Calpine Power L.P. Ltd., CPIF Holdings Ltd., Calpine Island Cogeneration Limited Partnership and Calpine Island Cogeneration Project Inc., Calgary, AB
Operate power generation and cogeneration facilities.

---------------------------------------------------------------

61) Investor: Holiday Acquisition Corporation, New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: Prince George Retirement Group Ltd., Victorian Retirement Group, Ltd., Victorian Retirement Group II Ltd., Calgarian Retirement Group, Ltd., Calgarian Retirement Group II Ltd., Edmonton Retirement Group, Ltd., Red Deer Retirement Group, Ltd., St. Albert Retirement Group Ltd., Lethbridge Retirement Group Ltd., Moose Jaw Retirement Group Ltd., Regina Retirement Group Ltd., Brandon Retirement Group Ltd., Montreal Retirement Group, Ltd., Winnipeg Retirement Group Ltd., Hamilton Retirement Group Ltd., Holiday (Canada) Retirement Group, Ltd., Kingston Retirement Group Ltd., Nepean Retirement Group Ltd., Ottawa Retirement Group Ltd., Peterborough Retirement Group Ltd., Niagara Falls Retirement Group Ltd., Retirement Group Ltd., Sarnia Retirement Group Ltd., St. Catharines Retirement Group Ltd., Burlington Retirement Group Ltd., Waterloo Retirement Group Ltd., Whitby Retirement Group Ltd., Whitby Retirement Group II Ltd., Windsor Retirement Group, Ltd., Steger Retirement Group Ltd., Fredericton Retirement Group Ltd. and Saint John Retirement Group Ltd., Victoria, BC
Own retirement residence facilities.

---------------------------------------------------------------

62) Investor: Holiday Acquisition Corporation, New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: Holiday Retirement Canada, ULC, Halifax, NS
Manages and operates retirement residence facilities.

---------------------------------------------------------------

63) Investor: Kinder Morgan Canada Company, Halifax, NS, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Cochin Pipe Lines Ltd., Calgary, AB
Operates a pipeline.

---------------------------------------------------------------

64) Investor: Nucor Canadian Holdings ULC, Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Harris Steel Group Inc., Harris Steel, Ltd., VSL Canada Ltd., Novosteel (North America) Inc., 2093776 Ontario Limited, 532962 Ontario Limited, Dixon Placing Inc., Epoxicote Rebar Inc. and Harris Steel Services Ltd., Toronto, ON
Manufacture and process steel.

---------------------------------------------------------------

65) Investor: Nucor Canadian Holdings ULC, Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: LEC Steel Inc., Brantford, ON
Processes wire, mesh and construction products.

---------------------------------------------------------------

66) Investor: 628579 New Brunswick Inc., Nyon, SWI

Canadian Business: Meridian Technologies Inc., Strathroy, ON
Manufactures and distributes automotive industry magnesium die-cast components and assemblies.

---------------------------------------------------------------

67) Investor: Weyerhaeuser TIA, Inc., Federal Way, WA, USA

Canadian Business: Domtar Inc., B.I.G. Logging Inc., Brampton Lands Limited, Domtar Realties Ltd., Elk Lake Planing Mill Limited, Northshore Forest Inc., The Sprague's Falls Manufacturing Company Limited, The Saint Croix Water Power Company, 3876420 Canada Inc., Isidore Roy Limited and Maine Timber Holdings Limited, Montreal, QC
Manufacture pulp and paper and operate sawmills.


March 2007

68) Investor: Laidlaw Transit Ltd., Burlington, ON, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Briggs Bros. Student Transportation Ltd. (its Briggs Bus Line Division), Edmonton, AB
Provides school bus transportation and bus charter services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

69) Investor: New Imperial Parking Canada ULC, Vancouver, BC, CDA (AUS)

Canadian Business: Imperial Parking Canada Corporation, Advanced Parking Systems Ltd. and City Collections Company Ltd., Vancouver, BC
Manage and operate parking lots and provide parking violation collection services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

70) Investor: 6676774 Canada Inc., Vancouver, BC, CDA (AUS)

Canadian Business: Fraser Surrey Docks Limited Partnership, IDC Limited Partnership, Fraser Surrey Docks Ltd., IDC Holdings Ltd. and Pacific Rim Stevedoring Ltd., Surrey, BC
Operate a shipping port.


April 2007

71) Investor: Cargill Limited, Winnipeg, MB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: United Grain Growers Limited (certain country assets), Winnipeg, MB
Operates grain elevators and crop input facilities.

---------------------------------------------------------------

72) Investor: Cargill Limited, Winnipeg, MB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: North Shore Terminal, Vancouver, BC
Provides grain handling, storage and shipping logistics services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

73) Investor: Cargill Limited, Winnipeg, MB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: United Grain Growers Limited (country elevators and crop input facilities), Elva, Blackie, Camrose, Equity, Vermillion and Viking, AB
Operates grain elevators and crop input facilities.

---------------------------------------------------------------

74) Investor: FS Acquisition Corp., Toronto, ON, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Four Seasons Hotels Inc., FSH (Canada) Limited, 984473 Ontario Limited, Four Seasons Hotels Limited, 1090178 Ontario Limited, 2035041 Ontario Limited, 2066751 Ontario Limited, 2103819 Ontario Limited, EFS Hotel Co. Ltd., F.S.A. Hotels Limited, FRB Corp., FS Vancouver (Employment) Ltd., FS Whistler Holdings Limited, Ikanim Holdings Limited, Vancouver Four Seasons Hotel Partnership, FRB Properties L.P., FRC Properties Partnership and Caramat Holdings Limited, Toronto, ON
Own and operate hotels.

---------------------------------------------------------------

75) Investor: 630193 N.B. Inc., Moncton, NB, CDA (UK)

Canadian Business: Tate &Lyle Canada Ltd., Toronto, ON
Operates a cane sugar refinery, distributes refined sugar products, and provides custom sugar products blending and packaging services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

76) Investor: sxr Uranium One Inc., Toronto, ON, CDA (SAF)

Canadian Business: UrAsia Energy Ltd., Vancouver, BC
Explores for and mines uranium.

---------------------------------------------------------------

77) Investor: Transdev Canada Inc., Montreal, QC, CDA (FRA)

Canadian Business: Limocar Inc., Limocar Estrie Inc., Limocar Roussillon Inc. and 2755-4609 Québec Inc., Boisbriand, QC
Provide bus transportation services.


May 2007

78) Investor: AV Aluminum Inc., Toronto, ON, CDA (IND)

Canadian Business: Novelis Inc., Toronto, ON
Manufactures, distributes and sells aluminum products.

---------------------------------------------------------------

79) Investor: Gibson Energy Ltd., Calgary, AB, CDA (UK)

Canadian Business: Boychuk Transport Inc. and Boychuk Leasing Inc., Edmonton, AB
Provide truck transportation services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

80) Investor: Kinder Morgan Canada Terminals ULC, Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Vancouver Wharves Limited and Vancouver Wharves Limited Partnership, North Vancouver, BC
Operate a marine terminal.

---------------------------------------------------------------

81) Investor: KCP Investment Holdings Canada ULC, Halifax, NS, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: KIK Operating Trust, KIK Holdco Company, KIK Operating Partnership and Kem Krest Canada, ULC, Concord, ON
Manufacture consumer products.

---------------------------------------------------------------

82) Investor: Maple Tree Acquisition Corporation, New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: Hub International TOS Limited, Beacon Underwriting Ltd. and HUB International Barton Limited, Burnaby, Salmon Arm and Chilliwack, BC and
Hub Financial (Prairies) Inc., Edmonton, AB and
Hub International Limited, HUB International Ontario Limited, Hub Financial Inc. and Hub Capital Inc., London, Brampton and Woodbridge, ON and
Hub International Québec Limitée, Montréal, QC and
The Wholesale Insurance Group Inc., Moncton, NB
Provide insurance brokerage services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

83) Investor: Xstrata Canada Acquisition Corp., Toronto, ON, CDA (SWI)

Canadian Business: LionOre Mining International Ltd., Toronto, ON
Produces nickel concentrate outside Canada.


June 2007

84) Investor: CCD New GP ULC, Providence, RI, USA

Canadian Business: Mel Hall Transport Ltd., London, ON and
Scott-Woods Transport Inc., Maple, ON and
Sonar Limited Partnership, Laval, QC
Provide freight transportation services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

85) Investor: CCD New GP ULC, Providence, RI, USA

Canadian Business: Direct Limited Partnership, Winnipeg, MB
Provides freight transportation, warehouse and distribution services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

86) Investor: CCD New GP ULC, Providence, RI, USA

Canadian Business: CCD Limited Partnership, Canada Cartage System Limited Partnership and Premier Truck Leasing Limited, Mississauga, ON
Provide freight transportation and truck leasing services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

87) Investor: 4398009 Canada Inc., Greenwich, CT, USA

Canadian Business: Intertape Polymer Inc. and Spuntech Fabrics Inc., Montreal, QC
Develop and manufacture specialized polyolefin plastic and paper-based products and packaging systems for industrial and retail use.

---------------------------------------------------------------

88) Investor: 4398009 Canada Inc., Greenwich, CT, USA

Canadian Business: Intertape Polymer Group Inc., Saint-Laurent, QC and
IPG Holding Company of Nova Scotia, Halifax, NS
Holding companies.

---------------------------------------------------------------

89) Investor: 4398009 Canada Inc., Greenwich, CT, USA

Canadian Business: ECP GP II Inc. and ECP L.P., Brantford, ON
Operate former Flexia assets.

---------------------------------------------------------------

90) Investor: Statoil Canada Limited, Stavanger, NOR

Canadian Business: North American Oil Sands Corporation, North American Oil Sands Partnership and NAOS Holdings Corp., Calgary, AB
Acquire oil sands leases and develop an integrated bitumen extraction and upgrading project.

---------------------------------------------------------------

91) Investor: 2133138 Ontario Inc., Toronto, ON, CDA (IND)

Canadian Business: Algoma Steel Inc., Sault Ste. Marie, ON
Manufactures steel sheet and plate products.

---------------------------------------------------------------

92) Investor: 3216444 Nova Scotia Company, Toronto, ON, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: UE Waterheater Income Fund, UE Waterheater Operating Trust, Union Energy Limited Partnership, GP Waterheater Trust, Protectron Limited Partnership, GP Protectron Trust, 2035881 Ontario Inc., 4211782 Canada Inc., 4202201 Canada Inc., Protectron Inc., VOXCOM Income Fund, VOXCOM Incorporated and 6509975 Canada Inc., Toronto, ON
Rent and service residential water heaters and HVAC equipment, and provide electronic security system services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

93) Investor: 0789970 B.C. Ltd., Moscow, RUS

Canadian Business: LionOre Mining International Ltd., Toronto, ON
Produces nickel concentrate outside Canada.


July 2007

94) Investor: Bowater Incorporated, Greenville, SC, USA

Canadian Business: Abitibi Consolidated Inc., Abitibi Consolidated Company of Canada, Produits Forestiers La Tuque Inc., Produits Forestiers Saguenay Inc. and Manicouagan Power Company, Montreal, QC
Manufacture newsprint and produce wood products.

---------------------------------------------------------------

95) Investor: Eimskip Holdings Inc., Garden City, NY, USA (ICE)

Canadian Business: Versacold Income Fund, Versacold Holdings Corp., Versacold Canada Corporation, Versacold Group Limited Partnership and Versacold Investments Ltd., Vancouver, BC
Provide refrigerated warehousing and transportation services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

96) Investor: J. Ray McDermott, S.A., Halifax, NS, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Secunda International Limited, Secunda Marine International Incorporated, Secunda Marine Services Limited, Secunda Atlantic Incorporated, Secunda Marine Atlantic Limited, Offshore Logistics Incorporated, 3013563 Nova Scotia Limited and Wright Cove Holding Limited, Dartmouth, NS
Provide supply and support services to the offshore oil and gas industry.

---------------------------------------------------------------

97) Investor: KAR Acquisition, Inc., New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: ADESA Montreal Corporation, Saint-Eustache, QC
Provides wholesale auto auction and remarketing services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

98) Investor: KAR Acquisition, Inc., New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: Automotive Finance Canada Inc., Vars, ON
Provides independent car dealer floor planning services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

99) Investor: KAR Acquisition, Inc., New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: ADESA Canada Corporation, ADESA Auctions Canada Corporation, AutoVin Canada Inc. and Impact Auto Auctions Ltd., Mississauga, ON
Provide wholesale and salvaged vehicle auction and remarketing, floor plan audit and lease-end inspection services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

100) Investor: LJVH Holdings Inc., Greenwich, CT, USA

Canadian Business: Van Houtte Inc., Gestion Internationale Van Houtte Inc., Capital Van Houtte SEC, 3804089 Canada Inc., 3804097 Canada Inc., 3804101 Canada Inc., Fiducie Financière V.H., Van Houtte Coffee Services Inc., L'authentique Pose Café Inc., Automates Alouette Inc., Pause-Café L'Estrie Inc., 2856425 Canada Inc., Les Cafés Orient Express Ltée, VKI Technologies Inc. and Gestion VHMR s.e.n.c., Montreal, QC
Roast and distribute gourmet coffee and provide coffee services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

101) Investor: New World Gaming Partners Ltd., Toronto, ON, CDA (AUS)

Canadian Business: Gateway Casinos Income Fund, Gateway Casinos Income Trust, Gateway Casinos Limited Partnership, Gateway Casinos GP Inc., GC Parking Ltd., Gateway Casinos Alberta Ltd., Star of Fortune Gaming Management (B.C.) Ltd., Lake City Limited Partnership and Lake City Casinos Ltd., Kelowna, BC
Operate casinos in British Columbia and Alberta.

---------------------------------------------------------------

102) Investor: SSAB Canada Inc., Stockholm, SWE

Canadian Business: IPSCO Inc., IPSCO Recycling Inc., IPSCO Saskatchewan Inc., IPSCO Sales Inc., IPSCO Direct Inc., IPSCO Canada Inc., IPSCO Finance (Canada) Corporation, IPSCO Investments (Canada) Company, General Scrap Partnership and New Gensubco Inc., Regina, SK
Produce steel plate and energy tubular products.

---------------------------------------------------------------

103) Investor: SSAB Canada Inc., Stockholm, SWE

Canadian Business: Kar-Basher Alberta Ltd., Edmonton, AB and
Sametco Auto Inc., Winnipeg, MB
Process scrap steel and operate a salvage yard.

---------------------------------------------------------------

104) Investor: 3218018 Nova Scotia Limited, Copenhagen, DEN

Canadian Business: Groupe Laperrière &Verreault Inc., GL&V World Inc., GL&V Global Inc., GL&V Canada Inc., GL&V NS Company, GL&V Acquisition Inc. and GL&V Investments Inc., Montreal, QC
Provide liquid/solid separation technologies used in processes.


August 2007

105) Investor: Abu Dhabi National Energy Company PJSC, Abu Dhabi, EMI

Canadian Business: Northrock Resources Ltd., Northrock Energy, ULC, Prairie Pacific Energy Corporation, Six Mile Resources Ltd. and Northrock Resources, Calgary, AB
Produce oil and gas.

---------------------------------------------------------------

106) Investor: ACTS Aero Technical Support &Services Inc., Greenwich, CT, USA (LUX)

Canadian Business: ACTS LP, Dorval, QC
Provides full service maintenance, repair and overhaul services to the airline industry.

---------------------------------------------------------------

107) Investor: GE Canada Real Estate Equity Holdings, Toronto, ON, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Dundee Real Estate Investment Trust, Dundee Properties Operating Trust A, Dundee Properties Operating Trust B, Dundee Properties (GP) Inc. and Dundee Properties Limited Partnership (266 commercial and office properties), Toronto, ON
Operate commercial and office properties.


September 2007

108) Investor: Advantage Energy Income Fund, Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Sound Energy Trust, SET Resources Inc. and Mamba Production Partnership, Calgary, AB
Explore for, develop, acquire and produce petroleum and natural gas.

---------------------------------------------------------------

109) Investor: CIP Canada Investment Inc., Fredericton, NB, CDA (BVI)

Canadian Business: Stratos Global Corporation, Stratos Wireless Inc., Stratos Canada Inc. and Stratos Funding Company, St. John's, NL
Design and implement mobile and fixed site remote telecommunications services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

110) Investor: EnerMax Services Inc., Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Strike Oilfield Services Inc., Drayton Valley, AB
Provides oilfield fluids storage, management, transportation and recovery services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

111) Investor: Ryder Truck Rental Canada Ltd., Mississauga, ON, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Partner Dedicated Services Incorporated and Pollock Logistics Limited, London, ON and Pollock Property Management Limited and Pollock Rentals Limited, Strathroy, ON
Provide truck leasing and rental services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

112) Investor: Red Sky Holdings LP, Vancouver, BC, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: CCS Inc., CCS Caverns Limited, CCS Holding Trust, CCS International Holdings Inc., CCS Operations GP Inc., CCS Operations Limited Partnership, 1285625 Alberta Ltd., Beck Drilling &Environmental Services Ltd., Hazco Industrial Services Ltd., Hazco Transportation Services Ltd., HMI Transportation Ltd. and Maxen Services Inc., Calgary, AB
Provide oil and gas waste treatment, drilling and oilfield services, operate landfills, and distribute and sell crude oil.

---------------------------------------------------------------

113) Investor: Sprague Energy Corp., Portsmouth, NH, USA (SWE)

Canadian Business: 9047-1137 Québec Inc., Kildair Service Ltée, Wintergreen Transport Corp. Ltée and Transit P.M. Inc., Saint-Paul-de-Joliette, QC
Distribute and sell asphalt and heavy fuel oil, and provide petroleum products storage and distribution services.


October 2007

114) Investor: Combine Plant Rostselmash Ltd., Rostov-on-Don, RUS

Canadian Business: Buhler Industries Inc., Winnipeg, MB
Manufactures tractors and other farm equipment.

---------------------------------------------------------------

115) Investor: 1339971 Alberta Ltd., Houston, TX, USA

Canadian Business: Western Oil Sands Inc., 852006 Alberta Ltd., Western Oil Sands Limited Partnership, Western Oil Sands Finance Inc., 1318214 Alberta Ltd. and 1331614 Alberta Ltd., Calgary, AB
Produce oil and gas.

---------------------------------------------------------------

116) Investor: Rio Tinto Canada Holding Inc., Montreal, QC, CDA (UK)

Canadian Business: Alcan Inc., Aluminum Company of Canada Limited, Alcan International Limited, Alcan Adminco Inc., Alcan Management Services Canada Limited, Alcan Realty Limited, Alcan Packaging Capalux Inc., Interglass Inc., Technologie Pechiney Limitée, The Roberval and Saguenay Railway Co., Alcan Shipping Services Limited and Corporation de Pêche Ste-Marguerite Inc., Montreal, QC
Manufacture and distribute plastic bottles, corking capsules and pharmaceutical tubing, provide technology and marine consultation and railway transportation services, and operate a fishing club.

---------------------------------------------------------------

117) Investor: Rio Tinto Canada Holding Inc., Montreal, QC, CDA (UK)

Canadian Business: Pechiney Plastic Packaging Canada Inc., Brampton, ON
Manufactures plastic bottles and packaging.

---------------------------------------------------------------

118) Investor: Rio Tinto Canada Holding Inc., Montreal, QC, CDA (UK)

Canadian Business: Alcan Packaging Canada Limited, Toronto, ON
Manufactures food, tobacco, pharmaceutical, cosmetic and flexible packaging.

---------------------------------------------------------------

119) Investor: Rio Tinto Canada Holding Inc., Montreal, QC, CDA (UK)

Canadian Business: Aluminerie de Bécancour Inc., Bécancour, QC and
Aluminerie Alouette Inc., Sept-Îles, QC
Manufacture primary aluminum.

---------------------------------------------------------------

120) Investor: Rio Tinto Canada Holding Inc., Montreal, QC, CDA (UK)

Canadian Business: Électrification Charpente Levage Services Inc., Québec, QC
Provides smelter equipment engineering, construction and installation services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

121) Investor: Rio Tinto Canada Holding Inc., Montreal, QC, CDA (UK)

Canadian Business: Alcan Alesa Technologies Limited, Mont-Royal, QC
Provides engineering services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

122) Investor: 632422 N.B. Ltd., New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: Novamerican Steel Inc., 156499 Canada Inc., Nova Steel Ltd. and Delta Tube and Company Limited Partnership, LaSalle, QC
Process and distribute steel, stainless steel and aluminum products, and operate a tube mill.

---------------------------------------------------------------

123) Investor: 632422 N.B. Ltd., New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: Nova Tube Ontario Inc., Mississauga, ON
Manufactures cold-rolled high quality mechanical tubing.

---------------------------------------------------------------

124) Investor: 632422 N.B. Ltd., New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: Cresswell Industries Inc., Granby, Shawinigan and Saint-Hubert, QC
Manufactures and processes steel products.

---------------------------------------------------------------

125) Investor: 632422 N.B. Ltd., New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: Nova Tube Inc., Baie d'Urfé, QC
Manufactures hot-rolled tubes.

---------------------------------------------------------------

126) Investor: 632422 N.B. Ltd., New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: Argo Steel Ltd., Dorval, QC
Manufactures hot-rolled, cold-rolled and galvanized products.

---------------------------------------------------------------

127) Investor: 632422 N.B. Ltd., New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: Nova Steel Processing Centre Ltd., Stoney Creek, ON
Provides coil pickling and slitting services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

128) Investor: United States Steel Corporation, Pittsburg, PA, USA

Canadian Business: Stelco Inc., Hamilton Steel GP Inc., Lake Erie Steel GP Inc., Hamilton Coke GP Inc., Lake Erie Coke GP Inc., HMLTN Energy GP Inc., Lake Erie Energy GP Inc., HLE Mining GP Inc., Hamilton Land GP Inc., Lake Erie Land GP Inc., Hamilton Steel Limited Partnership, Lake Erie Steel Limited Partnership, Hamilton Coke Limited Partnership, Lake Erie Coke Limited Partnership, HMLTN Energy Limited Partnership, Lake Erie Energy Limited Partnership, Lake Erie Slab Company Inc., Hamilton Land Limited Partnership, Lake Erie Land Limited Partnership and Z-Line Company, Hamilton, ON
Produce steel.

---------------------------------------------------------------

129) Investor: 0795167 B.C. Ltd., Westchester, IL, USA

Canadian Business: E.D. Smith and Sons Limited, E.D. Smith &Sons, GP Ltd. and E.D. Smith &Sons LP, Winona, Seaforth and Cambridge, ON
Manufacture food products.


November 2007

130) Investor: Abu Dhabi National Energy Company PJSC, Abu Dhabi, EMI

Canadian Business: Pioneer Natural Resources Canada Inc., Pioneer Canada ULC and Pioneer Natural Resources Canada, Calgary, AB
Produce oil and gas.

---------------------------------------------------------------

131) Investor: Abu Dhabi National Energy Company PJSC, Abu Dhabi, EMI

Canadian Business: PrimeWest Energy Trust, PrimeWest Energy Inc., PrimeWest America Inc., PrimeWest Energy North America Partnership, PrimeWest Energy Development ULC, PrimeWest Oil LLC, PrimeWest Petroleum Inc., SLP Holdings Inc., Shiningbank Operating Trust and Shiningbank Limited Partnership, Calgary, AB
An oil and gas investment trust.

---------------------------------------------------------------

132) Investor: Everclear Acquisition Corporation, Addison, TX, USA

Canadian Business: IPC Realty Holdings Company, IPC Investment Holdings Canada Inc., IPC Realty Limited and PRF Holdings Inc., Toronto, ON
A real estate investment trust.


December 2007

133) Investor: Galenica Canada Ltd., Berne, SWI

Canadian Business: Aspreva Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Victoria, BC
Identifies, develops and commercializes evidence-based medicines for the pharmaceuticals industry.

---------------------------------------------------------------

134) Investor: Knight Holdco LLC, Knight Holdco DE Inc., Knight Midco, Inc. and Knight Acquisition Corp., Houston, TX, USA

Canadian Business: KM Canada Holdings ULC, Terasen Pipelines (Jet Fuel) Inc., Kinder Morgan Canada Inc., 6041445 Canada Inc., Express GP Amalco, 1020019 Alberta Ltd., Kinder Morgan Canada Terminals ULC, Kinder Morgan Canada Company, Kinder Morgan Cochin ULC, Trans Mountain Pipeline LP and Kinder Morgan Canada CO2 ULC, Calgary, AB
Acquire and build terminal assets, operate pipelines, marine terminals and the Vancouver Wharves, and provide jet fuel transportation services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

135) Investor: Newmont Mining B.C. Limited, Vancouver, BC, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Miramar Mining Corporation, Miramar Con Mine Ltd. and Miramar Hope Bay Ltd., Vancouver, BC
Explore and develop gold bearing mineral properties.

---------------------------------------------------------------

136) Investor: Penn West Energy Trust, Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Vault Energy Trust, Vault Energy Inc., Canetic Resources Trust and Canetic Resources Inc., Calgary, AB
Explore for, develop, acquire and produce petroleum and natural gas.

---------------------------------------------------------------

137) Investor: TWP Acquisition Company Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA

Canadian Business: Westwind Capital Corporation, Westwind Partners Inc. and Westwind Partners (USA) Inc., Toronto, ON
Provide investment banking services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

138) Investor: 3223127 Nova Scotia Limited, New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: Consolidated Fastfrate Inc., Canada Drayage Inc. and Koch Transport Inc., Woodbridge, ON
Provide transportation and logistics services.


January 2008

139) Investor: FirstGroup Acquisition Corporation, London, UK (SCO)

Canadian Business: Greyhound Canada Transportation Corp., GCTC Leasing Ltd., Gray Coach Travel Inc., Greyhound Courier Express Ltd. and Penetang-Midland Coach Lines Limited, Calgary, AB and
Briggs Bus Lines Ltd., Edmonton, AB and
Laidlaw Transit Ltd., Burlington, ON and
Langdon's Coach Lines Co. Ltd., King City, ON and
Autobus Transco (1988) Inc., LaSalle, QC
Provide passenger transportation services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

140) Investor: Jardine Brook Holdings Limited, Saint John, NB, CDA (BER)

Canadian Business: Universal Holdings Ltd., Timber Transport Limited, Universal Investment Corporation, Universal Properties Limited, Irving Transportation Services Limited, Grand Lake Timber Limited, Protrans Personnel Services Inc., RST Industries Limited, Midland Transport Limited, Moncton Wildcats Hockey Club Limited and Sunbury Transport Limited, Saint John, NB
Provide transportation, courier, container, freight brokerage, refrigerated food warehousing, distribution and personnel agency services. Operate a sawmill. Own a hockey club.

---------------------------------------------------------------

141) Investor: The Independent Order of Foresters, Toronto, ON, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Unity of Life Canada, Mississauga, ON
Provides life insurance products and services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

142) Investor: New Omaha Holdings LLC, New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: CardSolve International Inc., London, ON
Provides merchant acquiring services for Visa credit cards and business solutions for Visa processing services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

143) Investor: New Omaha Holdings LLC, New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: First Data Loan Company, Canada, Mississauga, ON
Provides merchant acquiring services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

144) Investor: New Omaha Holdings LLC, New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: Datawire Communications Networks Inc., Toronto, ON
Provides transaction delivery services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

145) Investor: New Omaha Holdings LLC, New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: First Data/Paymentech Canada Partner Inc., First Data Acquisition Corp., Integrated Payments Systems Canada Inc., TASCanada Technology Inc., TeleCheck Services Canada, Inc., First Data Canada General Partnership No. 1 and Unified Network Payment Solutions (Partnership), Toronto, ON
Provide financial services, money order services, point of sale solution services, cheque verification services, merchant acquiring services and sell credit card and leasing services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

146) Investor: 1364514 Alberta ULC, Markham, ON, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: COGNOS Incorporated, 3098000 Nova Scotia Company and Cognos Holdings Inc., Ottawa, ON
Provide business intelligence and corporate performance management software solutions.


February 2008

147) Investor: Axcan Intermediate Holdings Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA

Canadian Business: Axcan Pharma Inc., Mont-Saint-Hilaire, QC
Develops and sells gastrointestinal prescription products.

---------------------------------------------------------------

148) Investor: EnerMax Services Inc., Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: 1124498 Alberta Ltd., Grande Cache, AB
Provides transportation of oilfield fluids and methanol distribution services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

149) Investor: Enerplus Resources Fund, Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Focus Energy Trust, FET Resources Ltd., FET Operating Partnership, FET Gas Production Ltd. and Tommy Lakes Partnership, Calgary, AB
An investment trust engaged in the exploitation, development, acquisition and production of oil and gas.

---------------------------------------------------------------

150) Investor: Joint Stock Company Open Investment, Moscow, RUS

Canadian Business: Viceroy Homes Limited and Viceroy Building Systems Ltd., Port Hope, ON
Design, manufacture and distribute high quality pre-engineered custom homes.


March 2008

None


April 2008

None


May 2008

151) Investor: ArcelorMittal Dofasco Inc., Hamilton, ON, CDA (NET)

Canadian Business: Wabush Mines Joint Ventures, Wabush Lake Railway Company Limited, Arnaud Railway Company and Knoll Lake Minerals Limited, Sept-Îles, QC
Mine, process, sell, market, transport and distribute iron ore.

---------------------------------------------------------------

152) Investor: Gibson Energy Ltd., Calgary, AB, CDA (UK)

Canadian Business: Chief Hauling Contractors Inc., Calgary, AB
Provides general commodities transportation services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

153) Investor: 1366390 Alberta ULC, Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Rainbow Pipe Line Company, Ltd., Calgary, AB
Provides unrefined crude oil transportation services.


June 2008

154) Investor: GE Canada Equipment Financing G.P., Montreal, QC, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: CitiCapital Canada and Citibank Canada (a portfolio of commercial financing loans and leases), Toronto, ON
Provide financing services for commercial loans and leases.

---------------------------------------------------------------

155) Investor: 6938621 Canada Inc., Emmy NA S.à.r.l. and Eskimo Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc., Toronto, ON, CDA (CYP)

Canadian Business: IPSCO Inc., IPSCO Canada Inc., IPSCO Recycling Inc., General Scrap Partnership, Genlandco Inc., New Gensubco Inc., Kar-Basher Alberta Ltd. and Sametco Auto Inc., Regina, SK
Produce steel products.

---------------------------------------------------------------

156) Investor: 6922767 Canada Inc., Toronto, ON, CDA (CAY)

Canadian Business: Aero Turbine Support Ltd., Delta, BC
Provides aircraft engine MRO services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

157) Investor: 6922767 Canada Inc., Toronto, ON, CDA (CAY)

Canadian Business: CHC Composites Inc., St. John's, NL
Manufactures composite aircraft parts.

---------------------------------------------------------------

158) Investor: 6922767 Canada Inc., Toronto, ON, CDA (CAY)

Canadian Business: CHC Helicopter Corporation, CHC Helicopters International Inc., 4083423 Canada Inc., CHC Global Operations (2008) Inc., CHC Global Operations Canada Inc. and Heli-One American Leasing Inc., Richmond, BC
Lease helicopters and aircrafts and provide helicopter transportation, repair and overhaul services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

159) Investor: Sword Canada Acquisition Corporation, Greenwich, CT, USA

Canadian Business: Saxon Energy Services Inc., Saxon Drilling Canada Limited Partnership, Saxon Drilling Management Ltd., Viking Drilling ULC and Drillers Technology Corp., Calgary, AB
Operate an oil and gas drilling and workover business.

---------------------------------------------------------------

160) Investor: TOTAL E&P Canada Ltd., Calgary, AB, CDA (FRA)

Canadian Business: Synenco Energy Inc. and Northern Lights Partnership, Calgary, AB
Explore for and develop oil sands.


July 2008

161) Investor: Ferus Holdings Ltd., Irving, TX, USA

Canadian Business: Ferus Limited Partnership and Ferus Inc., Calgary, AB
Provide cryogenic well stimulation products and logistics services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

162) Investor: RoadLink C-Truck Acquisition Corp., New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: CP Ships Trucking Limited, Montreal, QC
Provides local and regional truck transportation services.


August 2008

163) Investor: BRS Gas Corp., Calgary, AB, CDA (UK)

Canadian Business: Duvernay Oil Corp., Calgary, AB
Explores for, develops and produces natural gas and crude oil.


September 2008

164) Investor: Latin America and Canada Holdings Limited, Halifax, NS, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Rothmans Inc. and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc., Toronto, ON
Manufacture and distribute tobacco products.

---------------------------------------------------------------

165) Investor: Yara Canada Inc., Tampa, FL, USA (NOR)

Canadian Business: Saskferco Products ULC, Regina, SK
Produces nitrogen fertilizer.


October 2008

166) Investor: Broadcom Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA

Canadian Business: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (its Digital Television Business), Markham, ON
Designs and develops semiconductors for digital televisions.

---------------------------------------------------------------

167) Investor: Eni Canada Holding Ltd., San Donato Molanese, ITA

Canadian Business: First Calgary Petroleums Ltd., Calgary, AB
Explores for and develops oil and gas in Algeria.

---------------------------------------------------------------

168) Investor: 1413281 Alberta ULC, New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: Gibson Energy Holdings Inc., Gibson Energy Ltd., Canwest Propane Ltd., Gibson Energy Marketing Ltd., Gibson Energy Partnership, MP Energy Partnership, Integrated Propane Services Ltd., 1343126 Alberta Ltd., Rev Fluid Solutions Inc., Chief Hauling Contractors Inc. and Battle River Terminal ULC, Calgary, AB
Process, transport, market and distribute energy products.

---------------------------------------------------------------

169) Investor: 1413281 Alberta ULC, New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: Moose Jaw Refinery Inc., Moose Jaw, SK
Processes crude oil.

---------------------------------------------------------------

170) Investor: Ryder System, Inc., Miami, FL, USA

Canadian Business: CRSA Logistics Ltd. and Transpacific Container Terminal Ltd., Port Coquitlam, BC
Provide freight-forwarding and off-dock container terminal services.


November 2008

171) Investor: BBCL Holdings L.P., New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: Clover Leaf Seafoods, LP, CL GP (Bumble Bee), Inc., Connors CL GP Limited, KCR Fisheries Ltd. and 6162410 Canada Limited, Markham, ON
Distribute canned seafood.

---------------------------------------------------------------

172) Investor: Calyx Transportation Holdings Inc., Concord, ON, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Totalline Transport Inc., Vaughan, ON
Provides transportation and logistics services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

173) Investor: Calyx Transportation Holdings Inc., Concord, ON, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Bransam Logistics Services Inc. and Kreative Carriers Transportation & Logistics Services Inc., Bedford, NS
Provide freight-forwarding, transportation brokerage, warehousing and logistics services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

174) Investor: Canadian Storage Partners, ULC, Columbia, MO, USA

Canadian Business: InStorage REIT, InStorage Limited Partnership, IS Operating Trust, InStorage GP Trust, InStorage GP Trust Corporation and InStorage Trustee Corp., Toronto, ON
Provide self-storage services.


December 2008

None


January 2009

None


February 2009

175) Investor: Inmarsat Finance III Limited, London, UK

Canadian Business: Stratos Wireless Inc., Mount Pearl, NL
Provides telecommunications services.


March 2009

176) Investor: Lybica Holding B.V., Toronto, ON, CDA (RUS)

Canadian Business: High River Gold Mines Ltd., Toronto, ON
Explores for and mines gold.


April 2009

177) Investor: Dana Petroleum (E&P) Limited, Aberdeen, UK

Canadian Business: Bow Valley Energy Ltd., Calgary, AB
Explores for, develops and produces oil and natural gas.

---------------------------------------------------------------

178) Investor: 1754957 Ontario Limited, Toronto, ON, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Peter Lobraico Holdings Limited and OK Transportation Limited, Etobicoke, ON
Provide distribution centers, general cartage, logistics and moving services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

179) Investor: Polar Star Canadian Oil and Gas, Inc., New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: TUSK Energy Corporation, Calgary, AB
Explores for, develops and produces oil and gas.

---------------------------------------------------------------

180) Investor: Total E&P Canada Ltd., Calgary, AB, CDA (FRA)

Canadian Business: UTS Energy Corporation, Calgary, AB
Produces and upgrades bitumen in the Athabasca oil sands region.


May 2009

181) Investor: JLL Patheon Holdings, LLC, New York, NY, USA

Canadian Business: Patheon, Inc. and Patheon International, Inc., Burlington, Mississauga, North York and Whitby, ON
Develop and manufacture pharmaceuticals.

---------------------------------------------------------------

182) Investor: New CarCo Aquisition LLC, Torino, ITA

Canadian Business: Chrysler Canada Inc., Chrysler Lease Receivables 1 Inc., Chrylser Lease Receivables 2 Inc., Chrysler Lease Receivables Limited Partnership and Chrysler Receivables Partnership, Windsor, ON
Lease Chrysler vehicles.

---------------------------------------------------------------

183) Investor: New CarCo Aquisition LLC, Torino, ITA

Canadian Business: 2813017 Canada Inc., 2813025 Canada Inc. and 2813009 Canada Inc., Windsor, ON
Manufacture and distribute automobiles.

---------------------------------------------------------------

184) Investor: New CarCo Aquisition LLC, Torino, ITA

Canadian Business: 0847574 B.C. ULC, Vancouver, BC and
Chrysler Receivables 1 Inc. and Chrysler Receivables 2 Inc., Halifax, NS
Operate car dealerships.


June 2009

None


July 2009

185) Investor: Clean Harbors, Inc., Norwell, MA, USA

Canadian Business: Eveready, Inc., Eveready Operating Limited Partnership, River Valley Operating Limited Partnership, Eveready Directional Limited Partnership, Airborne Imaging Inc., Winterhawk Enterprises (Provost) Ltd., Astec Safety Services Ltd., Denman Industrial Operating LP, JL Filtration Operating Limited Partnership, Pembina Area Landfill Limited Partnership, Cat Tech Operating Limited Partnership, Mobile Industrial Health Services Ltd., Eveready Energy Western Ltd. and Tri-Vax Enterprises Ltd., Edmonton, AB
Provide industrial and oilfield services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

186) Investor: International Petroleum Investment Company, Toronto, ON, CDA (EMI)

Canadian Business: NOVA Chemicals Corporation, Genesis Pipeline Canada Ltd., NOVA Brands Ltd., NOVA Chemicals (Canada) Ltd., NOVA Research & Technology Corporation, NOVA Services (Canada) Ltd. and NOVA Petrochemicals Ltd., Calgary, AB
Produce and sell plastic resins and chemicals.


August 2009

187) Investor: Shell Energy North America (Canada) Inc., Calgary, AB, CDA (NET)

Canadian Business: Integrys Energy Services of Canada Corp. (certain assets), Calgary, AB
Markets and trades natural gas and electrical power and provides energy management consulting services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

188) Investor: The Western Union Company, Englewood, CO, USA

Canadian Business: Custom House Ltd., Custom House (Online) Ltd. and Custom House (Retail) Ltd., Victoria, BC
Provide international payment services.


September 2009

189) Investor: 1462627 Alberta Ltd., Amsterdam, NET

Canadian Business: Petro Andina Resources Inc. and Petro Andina Canada Holdings Ltd., Calgary, AB
Operate a hydrocarbon exploration and production business in South America.


October 2009

None


November 2009

190) Investor: CanEra Resources Inc., Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Talisman Energy Acquisition Inc., Calgary, AB
Holds oil and gas producing assets located in the Southern Alberta Foothills area.


December 2009

191) Investor: Avaya Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, USA

Canadian Business: Nortel Networks Corporation (its Enterprise Solutions Business), Toronto, ON
Provides enterprise communications solutions.

---------------------------------------------------------------

192) Investor: Area 47 Coöperatief U.A., Rotterdam, NET (LIY)

Canadian Business: Verenex Energy Inc., Calgary, AB
Explores for and produces oil and gas in Libya.

---------------------------------------------------------------

193) Investor: Ciena Corporation, Linthicum, MD, USA

Canadian Business: Nortel Networks Corporation (certain optical and carrier Ethernet assets of its Metro Ethernet Networks Division), Toronto, ON
Designs, develops, engineers, markets, sells, supplies, licenses, installs, services and supports networking solutions.

---------------------------------------------------------------

194) Investor: KNOC Canada Ltd., Anyang-si, KOR

Canadian Business: Harvest Energy Trust, Harvest Operations Corp., Readearth Partnership, 1057533 Alberta Ltd., 1115650 Alberta Ltd., Pathfinder Partnership, Harvest Pegasus, Harvest Breeze Trust No. 1, Harvest Breeze Trust No. 2, Breeze Resources Partnership and Hay River Partnership, Calgary, AB
Explore for and produce oil and gas.

---------------------------------------------------------------

195) Investor: KNOC Canada Ltd., Anyang-si, KOR

Canadian Business: North Atlantic Refining Limited, Harvest Refining General Partnership, CNG Trust, VER Trust, North Atlantic Refining Limited Partnership and Orange Limited Partnership, St. John's, NL
Operate a refinery and marketing business.

---------------------------------------------------------------

196) Investor: KNOC Canada Ltd., Anyang-si, KOR

Canadian Business: Canadian Maritime Agency Limited, Come By Chance, NL
Provides shipping agency services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

197) Investor: KNOC Canada Ltd., Anyang-si, KOR

Canadian Business: Waterstreet Orangestore Limited and Penneywell Orangestore Limited, St. John's, NL
Retail convenience stores.

---------------------------------------------------------------

198) Investor: MecaDev SAS, Paris, FRA

Canadian Business: Mecachrome International Inc., Mecachrome Canada Inc., Mecachrome Montréal-Nord Inc., Mecachrome Technologies Inc. and Mirabel-Mecachrome Inc., Mirabel, QC
Design, engineer, manufacture and assemble aircraft industry precision engineered components.

---------------------------------------------------------------

199) Investor: Petrochina International Investment Company Limited, Beijing, PRC

Canadian Business: Athabasca Oil Sands Corp. (its MacKay Oil Sands and Dover Oil Sands Assets), Calgary, AB
Explores and develops oil sands properties.

---------------------------------------------------------------

200) Investor: SCI Alliance Acquisition Corporation, Houston, TX, USA

Canadian Business: Keystone North America Inc., Toronto, ON
Owns and operates funeral homes, and provides funeral cremation and cemetary services.

---------------------------------------------------------------

201) Investor: 2219987 Ontario Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA

Canadian Business: Livingston International Holdings Trust, Adminserv Canada GP Inc., Adminserv Canada LP, Livingston International Holdings Inc., Livingston International Inc., Mendelssohn Customs Brokers Ltd., Livingston Transportation Inc., Livingston Capital Investments, Livingston International Holdings II Trust, Livingston General Partner II Inc. and Livingston II LP, Toronto, ON
Operate a customs brokerage, customs consulting, integrated logistics, freight, event logistics and managed services business.

---------------------------------------------------------------

202) Investor: 2219987 Ontario Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA

Canadian Business: PBB Global Logistics Income Fund and Livingston General Partner Inc., Fort Erie, ON and
Livingston LP, Montreal, QC
Operate a customs brokerage, customs consulting, integrated logistics, freight, event logistics and managed services business.


January 2010

203) Investor: Cliffs Natural Resources Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA

Canadian Business: Wabush Mines Joint Venture, Wabush Lake Railway Company Limited, Arnaud Railway Company and Knoll Lake Minerals Limited, Sept-Îles, QC
Mine, process, sell, market, transport and distribute iron ore.


February 2010

204) Investor: Atomredmetzoloto JSC, Moscow, RUS

Canadian Business: Khan Resources Inc., Toronto, ON
A holding company.

---------------------------------------------------------------

205) Investor: United Technology Corporation, Hartford, CT, USA

Canadian Business: GE Security Canada, Mississauga, ON
Supplies, installs and maintains communication and information technologies for security, fire safety, healthcare and educational applications.


March 2010

206) Investor: Rio Tinto International Holdings Limited, South Jordan, UT, USA (UK)

Canadian Business: Ivanhoe Mines Ltd., Vancouver, BC
Acquires, explores and develops mineral resource properties principally in Southeast and Central Asia and Australia.


April 2010

207) Investor: Georgia-Pacific LLC, Atlanta, GA, USA

Canadian Business: Grant Forest Products Inc., Grant Forest Products Sales Inc. and Grant Alberta Inc. (their oriented strand board mill and related assets, and their interest in Grant US Holding GP), Earlton, ON
Own and operate an oriented strand board mill and related facility.


May 2010

208) Investor: Quad/Graphics, Inc., Toronto, ON, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: World Color Press Inc., Montreal, QC
Provides printing services.


June 2010

209) Investor: 1527191 Alberta Ltd. and 1527203 Alberta Ltd., Calgary, AB, CDA (PRC)

Canadian Business: ConocoPhillips Oilsands Partnership II, Calgary, AB
A holding company which holds a minority interest in the Syncrude Joint Venture, engaged in the operation and maintenance of synthetic crude oil and products, and an interest in Syncrude Canada Limited and common shares of Northward Developments Limited.


July 2010

210) Investor: Northern Blizzard Resources Inc., Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: Nexen Inc. (certain assets), Calgary, AB
A portfolio of heavy oil assets located in the Lloydminster area of Saskatchewan and Alberta, as well as certain field office, administrative, marketing and transportation assets.


August 2010

None


September 2010

211) Investor: Apache Canada Ltd., Calgary, AB, CDA (USA)

Canadian Business: BP Canada Energy Enterprises, Calgary, AB
Explores for and produces natural gas.

---------------------------------------------------------------

212) Investor: Effective Energy N.V. and Uranium Mining Company, Moscow, RUS

Canadian Business: Uranium One Inc., Vancouver, BC
Mines and produces uranium, and acquires, explores for and develops uranium properties in Kazakhstan, the United States and Australia.

---------------------------------------------------------------

213) Investor: Total E&P Canada Ltd., Calgary, AB, CDA (FRA)

Canadian Business: UTS Energy Corporation, Calgary, AB
Produces and upgrades bitumen in the Athabasca oil sands region.